I gave the polls, you can look at the Fatah party to see how popular the Abbas led government is. Historically you are right, but right now Palestinians are not looking for peaceful solutions. I think Israel made them understand that they would be slowly annexed.
Edit: also I'd recommend reading the two state section of the Wikipedia article on Hamas.
I gave the other poll as it showed the impact of the war on Hamas popularity.
Hamas is popular in Palestine and other more radical parties are even more popular. There doesn't need to be a conspiracy for Hamas to exist, religion + an Apartheid state right next door is enough.
Nobody can vote in Gaza. But saying that Hamas was created and financed by Israel when their ideas are clearly popular is ridiculous.
You can say that Israel caused this mess by annexing Palestine. By putting an effective regime of Apartheid. But saying that Hamas or their actions are not popular among the general population is false.
Do you realise most Palestinians living in gaza prefer an even more radical political party ? Hamas is progressive for Palestine.
Hamas has at least sometimes opened up to a two state solution. Most Palestinians would prefer that Israel disappeared.
None of that means that civilians should die or that war crimes and annexation should be committed by the state of Israel. But it's just plain false to say that the actions of Hamas are unsupported by the Palestinians. Just like there are plenty of genocidal maniacs in Israel there are plenty of genocidal maniacs in Palestine.
That said Israel is the occupying force, they should be held to a higher standard than Hamas and so far they have failed, managing to kill even more civilians.
Edit: wrote west bank instead of Gaza, brain fart.
Beh oui, arrêtons de construire des HLM puisque la population locale est contre. Arrêtons de construire des lignes de trains puisque la population locale est contre.
Qu'on le veuille ou non beaucoup de projets vont avoir des externalités négatives, il y aura toujours des populations prêtes à défendre leur intérêts au détriment de la collectivité.
La ZAD de Saclay est une très bonne illustration, on va s'opposer à la construction d'une ligne de métro car on est opposé à la densification du plateau de Saclay. Alors que la région parisienne est en manque cruel de logements, on va s'opposer à la création d'une ligne de transport en commun.
Cette écologie court termiste qui ne regarde que l'échelle locale est une menace pour l'environnement. C'est normal que l'état agisse. L'écologie se joue au niveau politique nationale et régionale, pas au niveau local.
Mais le ministère des Finances n’a pas ces pudeurs. Le projet de loi de Finances 2024 affiche les seuils d’emploi 2024 (EPT). 1331 postes sont supprimés dans l’enseignement du premier degré et 680 dans le second degré. Le privé voit partir 501 emplois. Au total ce sont 2512 postes qui sont supprimés. D’autres postes sont créés ailleurs : 24 000 pour la vie de l’élève (des postes d’AED et d’AESH) et 104 pour la Jeunesse pour accompagner le développement du SNU.
J'ai l'impression que c'est plutôt positif non ? Si les profs choppent un ou deux élèves de plus par classe a cause de la suppression de postes mais ont un soutien pour les élèves les plus difficiles ça peut passer.
Le budget est à la hausse après tout. Ceci j'aurais préféré des augmentations d'impôts et une éducation publique mieux financé mais force est de reconnaître que les français ne veulent pas de ça.
You can absolutely go to a corner store and buy alcohol. It's not a coincidence that it kills 3 million people per year worldwide.
Making drugs more accessible will increase consumption, that said it might reduce the negative effects for the consumers. If we allow the sell of drugs we should do everything we can to avoid the current situation with alcohol.
Make the packaging ugly, make people understand that they are consuming something that will at best reduce their life expectancy at worst kill them and generally reduce he quality of their lives.
These models are Markov chains yes. But many things are Markov chains, I'm not sure that describing these as Markov chains helps gain understanding.
The way these models generate text is iterative. They do it word by word. Every time they need to generate a word they will randomly select one from their vocabulary. The trick to generating coherent text is that different words are more likely to happen depending on the previous words.
For example for the sentence "that is a huge grey" the word elephant is more likely than flamingo.
The temperature is the way you select your word. If it is low you will always select the most likely word. Increasing the temperature will make the random choice more random giving each word a more equal chance.
Seeing as these models function randomly there is nothing preventing them from producing unique text. After all, something like jsbHsbe d dhebsUd is unique but not very interesting.
This chatgpt cannot create a truly unique new sentence for example (A thing any of us here could easily do).
What ?
Of course it can, it's randomly generating sentences. It's probably better than humans at that. If you want more randomness at the cost of text coherence just increase the temperature.
Even if 99% of it would evaporate that would still be a ridiculous amount of power.
But Bill Gates proved that diversifying a stock of mainly one company while having that company keep all its value is possible. Elon Musk is horrifyingly rich like it or not. His power and the damage he can do is huge.
Ma tante a eu la légion d'honneur (patronne d'une partie d'une grosse entreprise française). Quand elle l'a eu pas mal des têtes des entreprises de son secteur l'ont eu. Du coup la justification c'est les services que le secteur a fait a la France.
En plus c'était après le COVID et suppression de postes, les syndicats ont trouvé la chose gonflé.
Hamas is controlling Gaza through a dictatorship yes. But their ideas are popular.
Even more radical political parties like Lion's den or Palestinian islamic jihad having higher approval ratings.
That said even Fatah is more popular than Hamas.
https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/polls-show-majority-gazans-were-against-breaking-ceasefire-hamas-and-hezbollah