I guess it depends country by country.
A company that is not netting anything at the end of the year or if it's loosing money is a direct loss on the entrepreneur's salary. Also if you do this too much, then it's the entrepreneur that should fix the missing money for his employees or for other company with which he is in debt with.
Then again, it's on the government to make sure this guy pays for the debt he left behind.
Oftentimes the story is different and somehow the boss manages somehow to "run away". Then if you speak about appointed CEOs into S&P500 companies, that's another story again because the "risk" there is really minimum for them, and other than "their image" they don't risk anything.
In my opinion salary difference should always be a thing, but it should be balanced by the risk of the investment from the CEOs. Nowadays too many companies are bailed out by the government, so basically there's no risk of running the business and huge salary for the top management. That's an issue.
Non lo metto in dubbio che sia buono. Mi pare solo un po' la scoperta dell'acqua calda.
Poi il fatto che venga servito 9 volte su 10 con le tagliatelle mi par strano.
That is a SUPERDOUBT. I seriously doubt the price was that even for a shitty Heineken/becks/dreher beer. We had inflation growing almost everywhere (except Switzerland but they simply keep repeating it to themselves, hotel prices are at least 15-25% more expensive than pre-covid)
Also, euro/dollar exchange rate is now the same as it was pre-covid
I'm not saying you cant find good deals but that beer price in a restaurant is unrealistic.
You can add more water from the pot and more Parmigiano Reggiano, the sauce is going to be godly. If you use "canned parmesan" tho, it's not going to taste good.
"The Direct Selling Association represents companies that account for nearly 90 percent of the multi-level marketing industry’s total sales volume, Mariano said. Its site lists 92 members, ranging from household names such as Amway and Herbalife to smaller shops."
Poi cerchi Herbalife: "The company has been criticized for allegedly operating a "sophisticated pyramid scheme".[5][6] Herbalife agreed to "fundamentally restructure" its business, in the US but not worldwide, and pay a $200 million fine as part of a 2016 settlement with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) following these accusations.[7]"
E poi cerchi Amway: "Amway has been investigated in various countries and by institutions such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for alleged pyramid scheme practices. It has never been found guilty, though it has paid tens of millions of dollars to settle these suits.[7][8][9][10][11][12]"
So it's more like a "shoutout" ?
I see the interest from both to have it there tho. If I purchase a ticket through the suggested app, both Apple and the seller get a cut right?
That's the informed comment I was looking for, thank you. But from my point of view it's still an ad. I don't care if Apple thinks is the right thing to do honestly.
Also what you quoted: "When your App Clip is associated with a specific location, you can register your App Clip to appear on a place card in Maps so people can open it from there. It can also appear as a Siri suggestion and in Spotlight Search as needed."
From this prospective looks like it's something I chose to do, but it's not, the iPhone was just unpacked, I put the glass-screen and the cover, updated iOS and that's it. So this behavior is default.
La prima scelta piu' etica è non cambiare telefono.
La seconda scelta piu' etica è comprare un telefono usato.
La terza scelta piu' etica è comprare un Fairphone probabilmente.
Io personalmente andrei con la seconda opzione per avere un range maggiore di scelta. I criteri per me piu' importanti sono:
Yes but oftentimes is better to check the comments for issues/procedures