Skip Navigation

𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠

@ ChairmanMeow @programming.dev

Posts
0
Comments
2049
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • You mean a minority of the shares is held by the public, and the rest is owned by large investment parties (64% approx.).

  • rule 32

    Jump
  • I'm always suspicious that this is an attempt to divert attention away from ICE murdering people. Same reason JRM made a fool of himself in the House of Commons.

  • People are mostly water, no? Makes perfect sense then.

  • Odd, not for me. For me it's still quite fast, loads near instantly.

  • So you were arguing a hypothetical point that hasn't actually happened. I'm not sure what the point of that is, you're essentially shoehorning people in a position that you believe they might take, despite them not actually having done so (and possibly wouldn't take in the first place).

    Word of advice: don't. People tend to not respond well to what is essentially a strawman argument. Don't focus on hypotheticals but on what has actually happened and what people are actually arguing in favour of. Otherwise you're having an imaginary discussion with imaginary people.

  • So either the rules hold, and the seizing was legitimate, or they don't hold anymore, meaning it doesn't matter it was seized?

    What were you arguing again?

  • She's been surprisingly pro-Europe though.

  • ReVanced seems to work well.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • In America the bottom picture follows the top one.

  • Both Hamas and Israel seem to agree it is a war? Hamas stated goal was to create a "permanent state of war" with Israel, and Netanyahu announced that Israel was at war as well. You think they're only pretending or something?

    I'm not sure what the point of denying that it is a war is? It doesn't undercut the genocide perpetrated by Israel in any way, nor does it justify it. Perhaps you could explain this as I'm not following.

  • Palestinians would be checking if Palestinians are sticking to the peace deal. It's not a good idea to do that, and that has nothing to do with them being Palestinians. You need a 3rd party.

    In case Russia and Ukraine brokered peace, you wouldn't staff an oversight committee on the peace deal with Russians or Ukrainians either. You'd get an outside referee to do so.

    Although my first choice wouldn't be a bunch of conservative white dudes either, mind.

  • It can be both.

  • Wouldn't follow up or ask hard questions about combined metrics. It's in their best interest to be enthusiastic about the numbers and push them to less critical media outlets everywhere, so the share price goes up.

  • It's a pretty braindead choice, but I'm not sure this board checks the Israelis in the first place. According to the deal, they are supposed to remove themselves from Palestinian land, so they should be outside of the territory the board oversees.

  • Sure, but a nuclear program is kinda hard to hide. Even spy sattelites will likely spot the signs, and good luck blocking those.

  • You can't fully verify it, but Claude is somewhat chatty. It'll output its whole "thought process", which can be reviewed. I recently had Claude write some C# analyzers for me, which I don't quite know how to write from scratch. I can easily review its reasoning and correct it if it makes a mistake. It'll say something like "Oh, I need to change X or Y" and you can then tell it it's an idiot and correct it.

    It's by no means perfect and it does need a good reviewer though. I've seen it just "give up" fixing a test, subsequently deleting the test entirely. If you're a good code reviewer, you can probably fairly effectively use these tools.

  • Espionage.

  • The "Board of Peace" is a bit more symbolic. The actual work will be done by the NCAG which is led by and comprises of Palestinians.

    The BoP functions a bit more like an oversight committee would in a business. Not handling the day-to-day, but monitoring progress and checking for violations. It kind of makes sense that that entity doesn't have Palestinians in it, as the board needs to make sure all parties adhere to the peace plan. This necessitates it to be a third-party (in this case the US, as decided by the US). It should be mentioned that there's also a Gaza Executive Board which also has Turkish, Qatari, UAE and UN representatives, which focuses on the operations of the NCAG.

    So yeah, definitely US bias leading to the BoP having largely US officials (and cockroach Blair for some reason), but it's seemingly not the worst thing ever here or evidence of an anti-Palestinian bias.

    Afaik, no Israelis are involved in any board/committee.

  • I'd rather have the war stop though.