I know plenty of people that say they're Christians that are good people. Pretty sure all the Christians i know that attend church voted for these christofascists though
I'm out. There is no point taking with someone that repeatedly lies to try to support their point. Look, I'm against the majority of LLM usage and implementation as well, and I'd rather most of it not be in firefox as well, but:
You keep making up things firefox does that it doesn't. I'm not even convinced you've used it
You keep talking about UX and dark patterns but you're obviously making it to as you go
Basing conversation on obvious falsehoods is a waste of time
And the fact that the confirmation feels “menacing” and defaulted to cancelling the opting-off (i.e. pressing “esc” or clicking outside the window; one must click the primary-colored “block” button which, contrasted to a grayish “Cancel” button, may psychologically induce the user into thinking “block” is a dangerous action), quite similar to the about:config warning screen.
I don't think it's menacing at all. It gives an informative list of features, which is nice to know. I could see a lot of people wanting to turn off all AI then realizing they actually want local translate instead of sending everything to google.
And you've got the button intents mixed up. Primary color is always the encouraged action in that kind of design. Dark pattern would be if the colors were flipped.
Yes... The solution to lobbying and citizen's united is to get rid of them... I was merely saying that was the locus of their power and that taking their money via civic means doesn't somehow give them power. Also, the flight of wealthy people narrative never pans out when tested.
concentrates political power in an even smaller number of people (those who are paying for everything
Somehow rich people paying taxes concentrates power? They already have all the power via lobbying and citizen's united. How the fuck would taxes give them power?
Look man, if it's a good solution it's a good solution. You're attacking things that haven't been proposed (by the bill in the OP).
I actually don't think legislation in a US state is a good way to create a technology standard so I wouldn't like to see this pass, but it's honestly the best way that I've seen to provide age verification for websites.
It puts the onus on the parents to set the date correctly and takes it off of businesses to comply by doing it themselves where privacy is definitely at risk. If this is what was implemented it would not harm privacy and it would defang the "protect the children" arguments they constantly use to justify completely destroying privacy.
You can rant and rage until you're red in the face, but those are the facts.
So you didn't even read it before writing a diatribe accusing me of supporting things I absolutely don't. It literally says in the fucking bill that you just input it into the device.
Provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder to indicate the birth date or age of the user of that device to provide a signal regarding the user's age bracket (age signal) to applications available in a covered application store;
I know plenty of people that say they're Christians that are good people. Pretty sure all the Christians i know that attend church voted for these christofascists though