Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G

Grabthar

@ Grabthar @lemmy.world

帖子
1
评论
550
加入于
3 yr. ago

  • Latitudes

    跳过

  • Cameras are pretty good at taking in light and giving a false representation of how you'd experience it if you were actually there. You see it at televised sporting events where it looks like twilight but they have to tell the viewers at home that it's full dark there. I'd imagine at 10pm, his web cam was just doing a much better job seeing than a human eye could.

  • Never Too Late

    跳过

  • It was very neat and definitely felt more like a pilot with how much it left unresolved. So much potential.

  • Never Too Late

    跳过

  • Can I do three? Reaper, Dark Matter (2015) and The Lost Room.

  • Guess it was true

    跳过

  • Not vector enough either.

  • 'Made-up quote' in Canadian satire site The Beaverton fools Time Magazine

    跳过

  • Fools the reporter or the AI tool they didn't bother to check up on?

  • Scandal

    跳过

  • We're hearing it was a sick ostrich.

  • Lost count

    跳过

  • Very courteous of you. That way dad can have the same fap too!

  • Woman

    跳过

  • Or choosing to skip it with birth control. Or having MRKH.

  • bract

    跳过

  • Not even a fucking involucre?

  • Learning to drive

    跳过

  • Weird. I don't think I have driven a modern car that lets you put your hands around the wheel at 9 and 3 because that's where the centre/airbag attaches. Most also have a third point at 6, so 10 and 2 or 8 and 4 seems more appropriate. Are you only supposed to rest your hands on the outside of the wheel now?

  • And, now, I don't mind a bit of a breeze, if anything I prefer it, but thon was aggressive. So, I says to myself, says I, "Colm, this is no day for a do..."

    跳过

  • Love this! I think these two would make a great add to any bar.

  • I SEENT EPISOD FOREAL

    跳过

  • Pour one out for Leslie Horwinkle.

  • Cyclists may be right to run stop signs and red lights. Here’s why

    跳过

  • For the record, for many years I used to live a few kilometers from work and commuted by bike. I gave it up after passing the second fatal collision on my route. I still try to be objective about traffic law. Given that you attach some importance to specifially cycling experience when adjudicating the obvious for anyone with any road experience, I don't think you are capable of having a reasoned discussion over traffic rules where bicycles are concerned, but I hope that I am wrong.

    The author tries to defend this exception to the normal stop rules as being unique from all the other road rules that sacrifice expedience for safety by saying there are only consequences for the cyclist when they get things wrong. That assertion is objectively wrong. It doesn't take much experience to know that vehicles making emergency maneuvers to avoid someone who screwed up can kill people, and that is true whether it is a car, bike, or person who thought it was safe to proceed but were wrong.

    And you'll notice that I have not made a value judgment regarding the change itself. That's because it's immaterial. I'm merely pointing out that there actually are consequences to consider that extend beyond the cyclist. The person cited in the article handwaves these consequences, saying it only impacts the cyclist who gets it wrong because a bicycle isn't big enough to hurt people. Anyone who has seen a stroller roll out into traffic can attest to the chaos that will actually happen next. Sorry, but I just can't stand to see an alleged expert missing something that big in his argument and everyone just nodding along. If you want such a change to happen, it needs to stem from an intellectually honest discussion.

  • Cyclists may be right to run stop signs and red lights. Here’s why

    跳过

  • No, if you read the article you would know that the person making the case for the rule change thinks it would be justified because there are only consequences for the person on the bike. But he is demonstrably wrong, which is my point. That is what was being discussed in the original post I replied to. Not how the rule works. Just that there are indeed consequences to getting it wrong. If you don't understand it, try reading the article and the comments again.

  • Cyclists may be right to run stop signs and red lights. Here’s why

    跳过

  • I don't think you understand the article or my point. The guy who is advocating the rule change says it is justified because there are only consequences for the rider. That is simply not true. That's the point being made. That has nothing to do with how the rule works. I don't understand what you don't understand that.

  • FIND OUT BITCH

    跳过

  • Cyclists may be right to run stop signs and red lights. Here’s why

    跳过

  • Read the comment. Helps if you understand the rule itself isn't relevant to the consequences for getting it wrong.

  • Cyclists may be right to run stop signs and red lights. Here’s why

    跳过

  • That's a very good point. Maybe you should read a fucking comment before you reply it. At what point did you see me say anything about the actual details of the rule? That isn't relevant to my comment. We were talking about the faulty argument regarding the consequences of when people inevtiably get it wrong. If you have anything pertinent to add on that point, please comment.

  • Cyclists may be right to run stop signs and red lights. Here’s why

    跳过

  • Simply not true though. Someone who doesn't want PTSD from turning a human being into a big red crayon is going to make panic maneuvers, which could very well cause a different fatal crash. There are lots of "good" arguments as to why we should be able to ignore traffic signs under certain circumstances, but they all require that humans consistently get it right. Take the extra seconds to stop and make the roads safer for everyone, or if that is so much of an imposition, please just take the bus.