Same goes for open-source though in the "no military usage" example, as the OSI says "No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups" and "The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor"
In euro office's case, the fsf acknowledges a lot of licenses as free and many allow additional terms (MIT for example). The AGPL just isn't one of them, and if onlyoffice decided that they did want to add rules, they could've chose another free license.
What makes them seem like they know nothing about MacOS? MacOS does make you go to System Settings for "unverified" apps. I used it for 3 years (fairly recently), and sure, at some point I entered a random command that I don't remember in recovery mode and got rid of that thing. But still it wasn't meant to be this way according to Apple's design.
It's just that most people dont know. Companies collect data of everyone, yet even in America you can't say that everyone is aware of it, let alone making it seen in major media/ social media (like 小红书 you've mentioned).
It's just that most people dont know. Companies collect data of everyone, yet even in America you can't say that everyone is aware of it, let alone making it seen in major media/ social media (like 小红书 you've mentioned).
Same goes for open-source though in the "no military usage" example, as the OSI says "No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups" and "The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor"
In euro office's case, the fsf acknowledges a lot of licenses as free and many allow additional terms (MIT for example). The AGPL just isn't one of them, and if onlyoffice decided that they did want to add rules, they could've chose another free license.