Serious accusation? Please. Trump does six financial crimes worse than this one every morning before his breakfast burger. All we're saying is we can see the grift.
Of shit. And died. With a stomach full of shit. While moaning: "I now understand how much of a jackwad I've been! How very embarrassing! This serves me right!"
This is the same Billie Joe whose fans went home from an "American Idiot" anniversary concert surprised that he got "political". I reckon there's plenty of scope there.
I'd say you're more likely to get a positive response if you use words like "deceived" or "conned" or "lied to" which place the fault on the deceiver.
"Fooled" isn't offensive per se; "chumped" is worse. But if I was wanting to convince someone that they had been maliciously given false information, I'd use language that doesn't raise hackles by implicitly blaming them for being deceived.
Edit:
"Played for a fool" is more offensive IMO, because now you're pointing out that the victim has some exploitable flaw which allowed the deceiver to make a fool of them.
Edit again:
Sorry for the double post. Something seems to be a little weird with my app.
I'd say you're more likely to get a positive response if you use words like "deceived" or "conned" or "lied to" which place the fault on the deceiver.
"Fooled" isn't offensive per se; "chumped" is worse. But if I was wanting to convince someone that they had been maliciously given false information, I'd use language that doesn't raise hackles by implicitly blaming them for being deceived.
I'm annoyed by the plethora of different ways we are coming up with to try and eject unwanted Tories. There are multiple websites and different innovations like this, all of which will just serve to split the vote in different directions. Can we centralise our decentralisation?
Serious accusation? Please. Trump does six financial crimes worse than this one every morning before his breakfast burger. All we're saying is we can see the grift.