That's not how this works. This will be the last time I ever interact with you.
I won't stoop to your level with insults, I'll just leave you with this: I fly 4 flags at my house: American, pride, Ukraine, and Palestine.
You spend so much time attacking us for some made up thing, when the truth is simple: your unbearable with your constant attack on anybody that doesn't agree with you. I WILL be voting for Harris, because a vote for ANYBODY else is a vote for Trump, and there are MANY more issues I worry about.
Homeless rights
Feeding low income families
LGBTQIA+ rights - I have a trans child, and a gay child
Ensuring we don't get a dictator
... And on and on.
YOU, for some reason, think it's a simple thing, but it's not.
I believe it's what they learned growing up on YouTube/social media. Demonetization is why content is censored, but when perceived from a child's eyes, without that context, it can easily be seen as "the norm".
I defended @beaver@lemmy.ca when a comment of theirs was reported.
I was just given context on this. Looking at their comments in that light, I have decided to ban them from !unpopularopinion@lemmy.world for all their bad faith arguments. Banning people for "bad faith" voting is bullshit. Coming here to defend that horrible action will not be tolerated.
I've never cooked tofu myself. The one good meal I had, I had been eating for 6 months before realizing it was tofu! It was great. Sadly, I moved from South Texas to the north, and cannot find a place that can prepare tofu I can stomach.
admins of other instances can see who voted, and what they voted. You can easily build a self-hosted copy so you're an admin, federate with Lemmy.world, and see who is voting on a post/comment.
Mods cannot see who votes on a post/comment, so this is the only way.
As you have complained about someone else responding to your comments in this thread, I require that you stop. There's no way that I'll allow you to request someone be silenced without you being quiet as well.
As this was reported as mod abuse, I retract the statement. I also have restored the other person's comment.
The mission made up of Ms. Patten and nine experts – which was not investigative in nature –...
(emphasis in original news brief).
According to the actual report:
The present report is submitted to the United Nations Secretary-General pursuant to the
mandate of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict
(SRSG-SVC), outlined by the Security Council in resolutions 1888 (2009), 1960 (2010), 2106
(2013), 2331 (2016), and 2467 (2019). This report contains the findings of the mission of Special
Representative, Ms. Pramila Patten to Israel
(emphasis added)
So, she wasn't a no-name 3rd party, but wasn't an investigative envoy.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/damning-evidence-of-war-crimes-as-israeli-attacks-wipe-out-entire-families-in-gaza/
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68006126