Skip Navigation

  • I like the idea, but they are generally added in batches.

    A president nominates a bunch of people, them they go through the betting and approval process.

    Example: the 234 judges put in place by Trump.

  • This is going off the rails. Locking.

  • The lion, the witch, etc.

  • News has in the past allowed videos that are relevant to the community topic - news. Allowing this to stay.

  • This community was being used to gripe, mostly by people who can't read site rules.

    It is a niche community, and one I enjoyed on the other site, so I adopted it so it doesn't become a cesspool.

    But you do you, I guess.

    What would you change?

    • speed run impeaching Biden
    • Do the same for Harris
    • Trump can point to her impeachment

    ^ GOP plan, prolly

  • The distance will be open source day one. As to the other question: still in the planning phase

  • We are looking at a composite rating, of many sources.

  • dubv is a weird one. You can ignore that one, as it does it to everybody. I think it's someone's self-hosted instance. Being banned there means nothing.

  • Looks like a mod in news didn't know that the ban on FlyingSquid was intentional, and unbanned them thinking I banned them by mistake. I'll fix that.

  • I moderate politicalmemes. I'm used to it :P

    With that said, I appreciate the well wishes.

  • so confused. I changed nothing! I swear! Anyways, cool, and thanks for the feedback.

  • apparently I can't Lemmy today. Maybe I should eat something :(

  • Now the cat is out of the bag, I am the one who put it to a vote. I came in to this thread to see if I could get Linkerbaan to at least apologize for actions/words, but they are more interested in "winning" the argument.

    Right now, it's not looking good, but we need quite a few more people to vote to know for sure.

  • I'll say it again, and I cannot emphasize it enough:

    MY ONLY REASON FOR BEING HERE IS THAT YOU CALLED MY MODERATORS ZIONISTS.

    You asked for the screenshot. I provided it. I don't care about your beef with world news. I was explaining why MANY communities don't want you on their roll-call - you're antagonistic, one-track, and ignore anything that doesn't match your argument.

    Example: You still refuse to even acknowledge my fully aired grievance.

  • Since you asked, I was just sent this:

  • dude. Look at my first comment. Where you attacked News as well. That's why I even showed up in this thread.

  • So, you're asking me to do what, exactly? Read their mind? Reading that, they were responding directly to the article, as-written, in the context of the assumption the article was factual. Reading it that way, they are calling the U.S., China, and Russia imperial powers, and, as the article states, that they were (directly or indirectly) attacked by Houthi.

    Where in that does it say anything about children, soldiers, or even people? I'm not sure where you're going with this. At all.

    Why don't you ask them directly, instead of me? I'm only talking about you throwing around the "Zionist" label, which YOU REFUSE TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE. No "sorry". No "MBFC is what I was attacking, not you".