dubv is a weird one. You can ignore that one, as it does it to everybody. I think it's someone's self-hosted instance. Being banned there means nothing.
Now the cat is out of the bag, I am the one who put it to a vote. I came in to this thread to see if I could get Linkerbaan to at least apologize for actions/words, but they are more interested in "winning" the argument.
Right now, it's not looking good, but we need quite a few more people to vote to know for sure.
I'll say it again, and I cannot emphasize it enough:
MY ONLY REASON FOR BEING HERE IS THAT YOU CALLED MY MODERATORS ZIONISTS.
You asked for the screenshot. I provided it. I don't care about your beef with world news. I was explaining why MANY communities don't want you on their roll-call - you're antagonistic, one-track, and ignore anything that doesn't match your argument.
Example: You still refuse to even acknowledge my fully aired grievance.
So, you're asking me to do what, exactly? Read their mind? Reading that, they were responding directly to the article, as-written, in the context of the assumption the article was factual. Reading it that way, they are calling the U.S., China, and Russia imperial powers, and, as the article states, that they were (directly or indirectly) attacked by Houthi.
Where in that does it say anything about children, soldiers, or even people? I'm not sure where you're going with this. At all.
Why don't you ask them directly, instead of me? I'm only talking about you throwing around the "Zionist" label, which YOU REFUSE TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE. No "sorry". No "MBFC is what I was attacking, not you".