No you can't. Don't want to hear about Trump? Then just go and drown him in the "beautiful ocean". And I solemnly promise you that I won't mention Trump after that.
I was playing it again just a few years ago. The game aged like milk. With shit. Yes, milk with shit. But for its time it was nice, yes.
Other games? In some of the older Test Drive games you were able to drive off the road, drive into the barn and ride over a chicken. It was a shock to me. It looked more realistic than a real life. And it was rain there. And you could use... no idea how they are called in English... those rubber thingies that clear the windscreen from the droplets or dirt... It was cool.
That's why experiments should have been done. "Too much" is almost always bad, but if the dosage is correct then -- snap -- and everything is super cool.
It might (I am not a specialist, but absolutely sure in this regard) affect differently on different categories of students. Clever ones would profit from interactivity, more stupid ones should continue to study in a more tedious way with less distractions for unimportant nuances.
The idea was nice. It really looked progressive. Notebooks might have provided an ability of more interactive illustration to material. You can't overestimate the usefulness of that. No idea what went wrong. It is worth investigating, not just screaming "technology bad, booo!"
Of course the implementation should have been more slow with assessment after each iteration and with experimental groups, etc...
No you can't. Don't want to hear about Trump? Then just go and drown him in the "beautiful ocean". And I solemnly promise you that I won't mention Trump after that.