Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S

Senal

@ Senal @programming.dev

Posts
2
Comments
755
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Linux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreement

    Jump

  • Yes, i get that, copilot is like opencode or cursor, though perhaps with less general access to models.

    There was a reply

    Copilot? You mean the AI with terms of service that are in bold and explicit: “for entertainment purposes only”?

    followed by

    I suppose GitHub Copilot is meant, which is a different thing.

    i was asking why github copilot is different in that context.

  • Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash

    Jump

  • There are many such projects that have done similar things that aren't getting the attention this one has.

    The reason this one it getting the attention it is, is because of the replies and behaviour of the dev.

  • Linux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreement

    Jump

  • Ok, so there are 70-81 copilots, github is one of them.

    Why is github copilot a different thing in the context of the reply that was being responded to ?

  • Linux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreement

    Jump

  • Different how, isn't github owned by microsoft ?

  • Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash

    Jump

  • I just tried vibe coding with Claude

    Jump

  • If you're stuck at review you aren't seeing 10x development, you're seeing 10x code generation.

    This is especially important because without the review/test/deploy part of the pipeline you aren't actually seeing any progress towards business goals.

    Once you do get these parts sorted, you can then look at what multiplier you're seeing.

    That's not to say there isn't an improvement in your workflow, just that you can't say with any certainty what kind of improvement without measuring the end to end.

    It might turn out that the rest of the pipeline is way easier , in which case your multiplier will be higher, it might also be much harder, in which case the multiplier will be lower.

    I'm not taking shots, i mean it seriously, especially if you need to report any of this to the rest of the business.

    edit : In addition, if it turns out that review is going to be a bottleneck you can get extra resource pointed in that direction which will benefit the workflow overall.

    another edit: i would consider correctly managing the expectations of those you report to as a vital skill.

  • Pic goes hard, feel free to screenshot

    Jump

  • Oh yeah, im familiar, crossed is top tier.

    Dropped off of my radar a while back, but I'll pick up again eventually

  • Pic goes hard, feel free to screenshot

    Jump

  • Posts show up on the lemmy equivalent of r/all regardless of community subscription.

    Not that that is necessarily a reason to change your rules, just pointing out that it's possible to see this post without a sub.

  • Graveyard Keeper is available for free on Steam right now

    Jump

  • Yeah my bad, crash to desktop, or in the case of the switch, crash to homescreen

  • had this convo just yesterday 🤦‍♀️

    Jump

  • I used effectual equivalent for a reason.

    I did say it was somewhat hyperbolous but there are real life examples that are possible.

    Something like extended bullying directly leading to suicide, lies with the intention of causing harm or death.

    Calls to violence that lead to deaths that otherwise wouldn't likely happen is a good example of one that can be technically correct but difficult to prove.

    Intentionally telling someone a door leads to safety when it actually leads to a spike pit is effectually the same as stabbing them yourself.

    Are those examples good enough for an answer?

    Im looking for how the idea holds up at the logical extreme so I can understand the bounds of the theoretical context.

    There doesn't have to be a good answer either, some ideas only work in a limited boundary and break down at the extremes.

  • had this convo just yesterday 🤦‍♀️

    Jump

  • I know its a hyperbolic example (though entirely possible in the context you describe)

    What would be your thoughts on speech that had the effectual equivalent of murder?

    There's no traps here im just interested in the thought process behind the context you provided.

    Side note: if verbal violence is possible then it would probably track that there are degrees of violence, much like the physical equivalent.

    If that's true the argument that you shouldn't regulate subjectively heavy violence because "who here hasn't physically hurt someone?" Isn't a reasonable as it sounds at first glance.

    For the record, Rowling is a shitbag, the potter books are mediocre and the actors were the best thing about the movies.

    None of that bias is in the foundation of my questions though.

  • Graveyard Keeper is available for free on Steam right now

    Jump

  • i played this game hard for a while, but there were so many CTD progress reverting bugs that it finally killed my enthusiasm for it.

  • Alright let's see pictures of your super nice rack-mounted, professionally installed labs. I'll start 🙃

    Jump

  • Custom printed.

    The front rack grills, keystone panels and thinkcentre mounts are from a website but all the other printed parts are custom.

  • Alright let's see pictures of your super nice rack-mounted, professionally installed labs. I'll start 🙃

    Jump

  • i'm not utilising it nearly as much as i should which is why i haven't gotten around to the failover cluster yet.

  • Alright let's see pictures of your super nice rack-mounted, professionally installed labs. I'll start 🙃

    Jump

  • a bunch of ebay specials with more ebay parts scavenged over time + some 3d printing.

    The centre tower has a miniitx mb and PSU behind those panels to run the NAS, and the drive bays are in the bottom.

    The right is a failover cluster that isn't finished yet.

  • Someone's cutting onions

    Jump

  • Consistently insightful, no needless words, astounding.

  • Someone's cutting onions

    Jump

  • Masterful

  • Someone's cutting onions

    Jump

  • See, no relevance to the response required.

    It doesn't even need to make sense.

    Still devastating in it's efficacy.

    I'll look into a way to archive Lemmy threads so that future generations might benefit from access to the raw brilliance.

    Rather than some paraphrased anecdote.

  • Someone's cutting onions

    Jump

  • Wordy, still stupid

    See , this is why i had no chance from the beginning.

    Simple, concise, cutting.

    You don't even need to understand what i said because your retorts don't require it. Genius.