You can just....turn it off? Devs can just.... Not implement it.
Not really that big of a deal imo.
impossible to guarantee that everyone sees the same "enhanced image".
Let's be honest this thing is not generating totally new faces per session the constraints on this tech are not so wide that we're going to think it's different people, you can alter the randomness of the models and it should be tuned accordingly.
In my experience with windows there's just a slight lagginess everywhere. I've had full gaming PCs still feel laggy just in Vscode. It's not bad but it's a small pain point that I don't want to experience for 40 hours a week.
Most of this work is done via emulators if you have a hardware attestation process built in, it will stop most of it. Obviously you still have a problem with phone farms but those are much more expensive than emulators and there's a physical capacity to them.
I agree the Fediverse is not in a good spot for something like this.
I actually think this is where the identity system of atproto will be more impactful here as it allows a better verification system. I've been thinking lately you should be able to use hardware attestation + biometric attestation on apps to filter these emulated users out.
TrumpRX might be the ONLY good thing Trump has ever done for consumers, but I constantly see articles like this and Democrats pick it apart in favor of...our current prescription system?
There's a reason Mark Cubans cost plus drugs is revolutionary for low income folks and even myself.
Not really on topic, but I recently swapped from Spotify to Qobuz and it's been a pretty good experience if you're interested in paying someone who's not Spotify
I think LLM detection is gonna be tough, I think a verification route and cutting bots off from the source is going to be ideal but not sure how to tackle that while respecting privacy.
I did have an idea of a app using nearby devices and after flagging 7 unique devices it's tagged as verified, interesting but not sure it'll work in rural areas.
I posted this in another comment but I think the nuance is really in what did they use the AI for. Are they using Claude code for the programming but did the entire artwork by hand? How many really care about that?
Compared to someone who tried to one shot a slop game with full AI assets and is just trying to make a quick buck.
You can just....turn it off? Devs can just.... Not implement it.
Not really that big of a deal imo.
Let's be honest this thing is not generating totally new faces per session the constraints on this tech are not so wide that we're going to think it's different people, you can alter the randomness of the models and it should be tuned accordingly.