Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
2
Comments
219
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Can he just change it to “X-Treme”? And use X for short?

    Or does Mountain Dew have that one too?

  • No no, I don’t mean anyone specifically in this conversation

    I was more speaking in general.

  • I mean I always try, because I believe in it.

    I think I’ve probably lost 40% of my total upvotes having this conversation though. On reddit when you go too deep into negative karma you need to make a new account because you can’t post in a lot of communities at that point

  • YouTube, mostly

    Various channels and whatever the algorithm feeds me

  • Which is what communism is

  • I would have disagreed with lobotomies too, had I been around for that. I don’t really see the point you’re trying to make here.

    There really isn’t any such thing as scientific consensus, not as it relates to truth. Science is ever evolving and asking questions, and re-answering old questions when we discover new information.

    There is no ‘this is settled’ in science.

    Well, you don’t know what genocide means. It’s okay

  • I know what the word ‘genocide’ means. The left just misuses words all the time.

    I don’t need to ‘do more research’

  • Twitter has always been a toxic cesspool, man lol

    How are you only noticing now?

  • I agree so much.

    I love discussing things with people who think differently than I do, that’s how we learn. We should be able to disagree in a civil way and exchange ideas and understand each other and eventually agree to disagree.

    But we can’t.

    Online it’s either one extreme or the other.

    When is someone going to have the balls to create a place where people can argue and talk shit out? Or is that just too mature for the kids online these days who cannot handle a disagreement?

    Maybe there should be online discussions that are age restricted. No teenagers, 30+ adults only. I wonder if that would be better or worse

  • I agree 100%

  • I mean, it only makes sense.

    If I want to stand where you’re standing, there is going to be some way to settle who gets to stand there

  • I only really ever comment when I have something to say. This usually is only when I disagree with something.

    That’s why my upvote ratio is terrible. I rarely comment when I agree with something someone has said. I bet my ratio would be a lot better if I did.

    But that’s just human nature, I think. Some people crave acceptance and validation so they comment agreement and some people crave conflict and challenge, so they comment in disagreement.

  • I’ve had people in this thread say that I advocate for genocide.

    I don’t think the right are the ones watering down the language

  • The right has moved onto other platforms.

    A lot of people on the right who would post online have been banned from most of the left leaning platforms and have found their own places to talk.

  • The libertarian right is also anti authoritarian

  • The libertarian right is also anti authoritarian

  • You need to enforce equity though, it’s not something that humans do naturally.

    Through that enforcement of equity you are choosing authoritarianism.

    There is no equity equilibrium to reach unless it’s from the threat of violence, to keep everyone down to the lowest rung. While hiding all the inequity that the ones at the top enjoy, or making excuses for it.

    Sort of how bill gates believe he should be able to fly in private jets because what he is doing is more important than what you would need to fly for is. So you’ll accept it.

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2023/02/08/bill-gates-private-jet-bbc-contd-orig-na-fj.cnn-business

  • When did I say that?