So tiny and cute, but those claws don't joke around even at that age.
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 52
- Joined
- 10 mo. ago
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 52
- Joined
- 10 mo. ago
First time hearing about Rocknix. Not heard about Rockchip too. Seems like a cool project though. Wondering where they got the driver from, or if they made their own.
Steam Input being independent from Steam would be pretty cool. Upstreaming it to the kernel is nice, but the kernel can be slow-moving, and it doesn't necessarily lend well to cases where you want to be able to deliver fixes to consumers outside of Linux's release cadence. Now, Valve could perhaps go release with 2 separate cadences, the older driver as a fallback, and offer a DKMS build for newer driver releases, but it IS work to make sure it doesn't bork someone's system.
Are we talking about the old controller? Or the new one? Cause I'm sitting here wondering... how are you able to see that, unless you somehow already have the new controllers?
Or are you using the Steam Deck's controller to check that?
Sorry for the volley of questions here, but I'm just super curious somehow.
Steam Hardware @sopuli.xyz What driver would the Steam Controller come with if not xinput?
Pearson is a disaster.
I dob't wanna hear that from a disaster.
Suppose 20 people make 30 things and have to share amongst themselves; they each get 1.5 things.2 people make 5 things; they each get 2.5.
And there's your asnwer. It's just math.
It's worth mentioning that GDP per capita is not a reflection of true average wealth of a national population. It is at best an estimate of their average quality of life, and even that has been becoming more and more inaccurate as more countries have more uneven wealth distribution. For example, in NY, the GDP per capita in 2024 is a whopping $604,619, but their median wage in 2024 is a mere $86,830.
Preface: I'm no linguist. Just someone who speaks both JP and EN. But boy do I love thinking about stuff like this. I'm not going to answer your original question though, cause the short answer is really just no.
Subject omission in JP is somewhat interesting because it's tied to their culture, but I'd like to sort of push back a bit on the thinking that it requires some thinking to figure out who the subject is.
Japanese is a context-heavy language, and this subject omission is an important cultural rule under that. But it does mean that the context needs to first be established between participants.
Suppose you walked up to a friend, waved at them, and said イギリスに行った (lit: went to the UK), most JP speakers would first think that you're talking about yourself. But if, prior to this conversation, say the day before, you and this friend A were talking about another friend B, and B was deciding where to go and you went to the airport with them, then this friend A would be the only one to know that you're talking about B.But suppose it's been a few more weeks before meeting with A. Then A might think you're still talking about B, especially if you've not mentioned going overseas to A. Then a misunderstanding can happen, and the onus is on you to clarify who you're talking about in the first place. You'd be thought of as someone who can't "read the air" if you constantly leave the subject vague without considering the context you've thus far established with others.Friend A can certainly ask for clarification if they know your tendencies, and within their own personal context. 「Bが？」 (t: B did?) they might ask. 「いや。私。」(t: No. I (did).) you might reply. Notice how I just used 私 with no particle; the particle is implied!
I find that a lot of newer learners have a tendency to really focus on this particular aspect of the language. I actually don't find it to be something that speakers need to expend on a lot of energy on. You know who you're talking to, and thus know and share enough context to carry on with the conversation. It's also common to remind each other of which context is being talked about to jog your convo partner's memory. If you have trouble remembering context, you can always play it safe and be sure to explain yourself, or check if your convo partner remembers it.
Oddly enough, I have a friend who got a bit turned off by this "feature" of Japanese and discouraged him from learning by a bit. He's always had questionable memory, so having to sort of "remember context" is a bit of a difficult ask for him. I don't think "remembering context" is a strict requirement to be a good speaker in JP cause it'd just be a quirk of his like it already is in EN. Us English speakers like to think we're quite rid of context when we compare it to the Japanese, but how much we know each other is context too.
Also, a small comment: just saying 私 in reply to your example for 誰？ isn't necessarily weird or robotic. It depends on your relationship with the speaker. If you usually use the polite form with the person, then yes, you should append with です.Now, if you didn't have the previous part where you're talking about having a stomachache, then even to a close enough friend, it's more natural to respond to the "Who?" with 私だ - not too different from EN in this case: it's "Me" vs "It's me".And when the sentence is お腹が痛い, you're 100% talking about yourself. If you're actually talking about someone else, it should be お腹が痛そう (looks painful) or お腹が痛いって ((person) said their stomach hurts).
One thing I commonly see in comments out of threads like this is the oversimplification of how the Japanese communicate. They might be polite and sometimes avoid mentioning the subject for convenience, but when you need tell someone to do something, you can do just that, with different levels of politeness.
- Polite: お願いできますか？ Can I ask you for it?
- Instructional (e.g. teachers): 宿題をしなさい。 Do (your) homework.
- Frank: お前がやれ。 You do it.
The Japanese is expected to be polite to strangers. But they don't interact with people they're familiar with in the same way, as it's usually perceived as a distant way to communicate.
Edit 1: Formatting and grammar
Bug types being super effective on Psychic types is always so funny to me.
I have big brain and move big things with mind, but a bug bite, it scares me.
The definition makes the argument here really. If being functional means that the system is functional for only a select few, then to the select few, sure it's functional, but to everyone else, it's not. If public transit is meant to be "public" and not just a "transit", then a system functional only to a few isn't what I can consider to have met expectation of its own definition. I'm certainly being strict about it, and you are free to keep your perspective; I'm not here to change it. I used to live in an area outside of Selangor where buses vanished after being virtually nonexistent, and public transit in KL & Selangor hasn't given me the slightest bit of sense that it's reliable, even before I experienced a better system elsewhere in the world.
Some part of my reason of outright calling it non-functional is political: I've set the bar higher than just having a system that works for those lucky or rich enough to live near a train or bus station. Imagine if you don't have access to the benefits of a public policy or system that only a few seem to enjoy, and these few people go around and tell others that the system is being functional. I'm not sure if that'll sit well with most people, especially when it's something that is or is close to a basic right.
From my original comment:
at least not 12 years ago
I've used public transport back 12 years ago to try get around places. It depends on what your level of acceptance is, but 30-40 mins for a bus in SBJ that's constantly late isn't what I could call functional. Taking more than an hour, using a mix of buses and LRTs, to make a journey that would've taken just a 25 min drive on a good day, can't be considered functional. Perhaps it works more reliably in specific areas, but we can't call a handful of bus routes a system, not when the larger system feels more like patchworks than a thoughtful solution. I'm not trying to deny your experience, but as someone who didn't grow up around the area, in an era before transit tracking systems were more accessible, I had to rely on someone to sort of guide me through the patchwork, and even then, there's just too much time spent waiting around, or you have to make a run after getting off a couple of minutes away, I remember running across a bridge just to catch another bus on time.
Too many Malaysians are too utterly subservient to their circumstances, only looking at what's in front and around them and never question why they're in that situation. "That's life," or, "That's fate," they say, as if being realistic is to only focus on what's right in front of you, instead of understanding why something happened and devising ways to fix issues at the root of it. I'm ranting and stereotyping, so I digress. I don't live there anymore, so forgive me if my image of the country and its people is out of date.
And I'm not surprised why local governments aren't giving a flying crap to public transit. It's also ineffective policy from the federal gov to just install bus routes without using carrots and sticks to pull local governments and the Rakyat (let's use their term of choice) away from cars; either they're being naive, or they are still more inclined to keeping the O&G and car manufacturers happy, in which case they're simply virtue signalling.
And now that we're in an oil price spike that may end up being a hill than just a spike, the reality that the country is overly reliant on oil is likely just slapping everyone hard in the face right now, with many not even knowing that there's an option where they wouldn't need to be slapped as hard. The federal gov has to step in with more subsidies, and with that, they're gonna have to cut something else. If they aren't using this crisis as an opportunity to promote the reduction in reliance on oil, then, once again, they're either naive, or we know where they stand on cars.
I apologize if this comes across as too critical of the country, the government, and its people. I'm sure there are people pushing for changes. I'm just not hopeful about their chances.
You jest OP, but many in the major cities are already stuck in traffic literally every day, and I have no doubt many are doomscrolling while sitting there.
Malaysia bought so hard into car-centrism they basically don't have a functioning public transport system anywhere, at least not 12 years ago, not even in major cities like Kuala Lumpur. I heard Penang is trying to change this a few years ago, though mostly only on the island, but I reckon it's going to take them much beyond another 15 years for there to be any tellable change in people's minds.
Good call on using the strikethrough instead of replacing it! xD
It works only if you ignore actual ownership :p
This looks like the so-called "Blue Tears" phenomenon caused by bioluminescent algae reacting in the sea.
He called an early election soon after Trump was elected to try get himself an even stronger majority while running on an anti-Trump platform, propping up himself as the only person who can go against Trump for Ontario (yeah, the facist-inspired playbook). He sort of succeeded at it, given that the cycle was short, there was rather little time for other parties to rally, a lot of people couldn't find the time to vote, and enough people bought into the idea that he can stand up to Trump despite people not actually liking him. The turnout was less than 50%.
Things take time, but there should be limits to how ridiculously sounding something can be. Away from public spaces, some people, especially foreigners, literally jab at Canada as the country that never gets anything done in a reasonable amount of time. Some just straight up say this country never gets anything done.
I live in Ontario, and I feel like I'm living in a bubble, because not a single person I've talked to likes Drug Fraud, but Ontario voted this sack of shit thrice into the office. Everything feels like it's in fucking shambles: the housing, healthcare, education (all the levels!); anything public aside from fucking businesses.
But then again, there's also an insane amount of political apathy amongst my peers (I'm around 30). No one believes that their ability to vote means anything. I'm not allowed to vote (I'm a PR), and I have to find ways to tell my friends to go fucking vote. While it's true that if shit hits the fucking roof I can always just move out, it hurts me to just watch my friends suffer, especially when a number of them are teachers and nurses, and they recount the sad episodes of the kids in schools and the patients in hospitals not getting the care they need.
In cass it's not clear from other comments, if the site tells you either one's wrong but not both, you can then brute force and try out a bunch of usernames and passwords to effectively farm for both: those that say "wrong username" means that the password is valid, while those that say "wrong password" means you got the username that's in the system.
Once you've collected them, the rest is just trying out every password for every user.
So... while this seems weird for a person, it is very much intentional.
Edit after several comments: I don't know why it's hard for people to look at the OP, take it for what it is, and argue for the sake of the argument, rather than claiming that something's impossible because of common or correct technical practices.
I know Lemmy hates AI with a fiery passion (and I too hate it for various reasons), but the ability to make this sort of prediction in a way far more stable than whatever else came before with natural language processing (fancy term of the day for those who havem't heard of it), and however inefficiently built and ran it is, is useful if you can nudge it enough in a certain direction. It can't do functional things reliably, but if you contain it to only parse human language and extract very specific information, show it in a machine-parsable way, and then use that as input for something you can program, you've essentially built something that feels like it can understand you in human language for a handful of tasks and carry out those tasks (even if the carrying out part isn't actually done by an LLM). So pedantically, it's not AI, but most people not in tech don't know or care about the difference. It's all magic all the way down like how computers should just magically do what they're thinking of. That's not changed.
My point though, and this isn't targeting you specifically dear OC, is that we can circlejerk all we want here, but echoing this oversimplification of what LLMs can do is pretty irrelevant to the bigger discourse. Call these companies out on their practices! Their hypocrisy! Their indifference to the collapse of our biosphere, human suffering, letting the most vulnerable to hang high and dry!
Tech is a tool, and if our best argument is calling a tool useless when it's demonstrably useful in specific ways, we're only making a fool of ourselves, turning people away from us and discouraging others from listening to us.
But if your goal is to feel good by letting one out, please be my guest.
Peace
libsdl seems like a good base. Seems like it's available in Debian and in the main Arch repo too. That's plenty good for Linux. Looks like it's also available for Windows too.
Then what was the fuss from YT reviewers about?