Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
31
Comments
200
Joined
2 mo. ago

🗽📈💰🇪🇺🧘🎗️🦁🤝

linux

  • That's not a bell curve, just a super accurate graph.

  • If everyone was like you my friend we wouldn't need unions

  • If I had a set amount of days I'm allowed to be sick, I would use every single one of them.

  • No they don't. I knew this from day one.

    Then again, I live in Europe where pretty much everyone including management thinks that anyone "skipping sick days" is a fucking moron.

  • $200/month will get you a Claude max x20 subscription, allowing practically unlimited opus usage, and pretty hefty Fable usage too.

    And this limit was per week. So they're pretty much just enforcing that people use subscriptions instead of on-demand billing.

  • Very much different than the USA.

    Yeah, exactly. Point being that there isn't just one way to do private healthcare, which means that just because one way of doing it is bad doesn't mean that others must be as well.

    Only sycophants use Grok.

  • This is just my take and in parts a guess since obviously I didn't go there.

    Peter Thiel is not Dr. Evil. He's just a guy with a lot of resources and name recognizition, so he can invite people to a conference. People get together to talk. Somebody attending does not mean they agree with whoever organized the thing.

    And specifically: Kaja Kallas attending does not change who Kaja Kallas is. Her party is the Estonian Reform Party, a conservative liberal party, so it kind of tracks that she hangs out with business leaders. Most importantly (I think), it doesn't change her awesome work and results in EU against Russian belligerence.

    So the dissonance: you (seem to) think that everyone who goes to a Thiel conference is some sort of a crook. But here's a person who is obviously not a crook. Perhaps the first assumption was wrong?

  • It's probably more important to do things well than to do them based on a strict ideology.

    Russia for instance was a great example of how to completely fuck up turning a country free market capitalist. And generally really just fuck up.

  • Nice of you to give socialism its turn.

  • Russia took over the GOP, not Democrats.

  • USA has one of the worst examples of health care: 17% GDP spending on health care. It's not just the most expensive private health care system, it's the most expensive health care system.

    But it's also not a fully privatized health care system, or even the most privatized one. Roughly half of the insurance spending is public via Medicare, Medicaid, military, etc.

    Switzerland's and Netherland's systems can be viewed as more privatized (100% of insurances are via private sector, NL almost all hospitals are private), and are way more efficient than the US system.

    Looks like privatized health care + private insurance works the best, but it does seem to require some guardrails (which you might call socialism, I guess). But also devil's in the details and it's possible to do everything badly. I also wouldn't be too amazed if somebody managed to do fully socialized healthcare well. But I would be amazed if such a system stayed good longer than a few decades.

  • Why doesn't it tend to happen in free market capitalist societies, then?

  • Because they're mostly wrong about their premises and thus conclusions. It makes perfect sense that they keep being poor until they fix those.

  • This is a failure of thinking known as "zero-sum bias".

  • They are the easiest people to replace with AI.

    Why aren't you doing it, then?

  • Yep. This thing you're feeling is called cognitive dissonance.

    Perhaps this is not the kind of conference you think it is.