Skip Navigation

User banner

lazyvar

@ lazyvar @programming.dev

Posts
37
Comments
68
Joined
3 yr. ago

Indie iOS app developer with a passion for SwiftUI

  • automatically turning on new (creepy)feature with no single click to disable them

    Jump

  • I feel you’re brushing over the privacy implications regarding how apps are used.

    Sure, you could say: “Oh, but it’s inefficient to compile the entire application, and what if there are features that barely anyone uses.”

    But you can also say: “Compiling the entire application ensures we don’t need to collect usage data and it ensures everyone gets the best experience, even the people that use features that are otherwise hardly used.”

    Now, of course, to go with the second option, you need to care about user privacy and not gain any benefits from usage data beyond the benefits for compiling it.

  • The OTP you want to use was already used

    Jump

  • USPS’ website does this, sort of.

    If their text service is down it’ll let you know and just skip the 2FA process even though normally they offer an option to get the code via email.

    The fact that they do this is bad enough, the fact that this happens so often that I’ve seen this at least a dozen times is even worse.

  • We beat Apple at their own game - let the unauthorized calibrations BEGIN!

    Jump

  • For one it’s just technicalities for another it’s the distinction between a company going out of their way to block repairs or a company just not caring and mainly focussing on their own repair process.

  • We beat Apple at their own game - let the unauthorized calibrations BEGIN!

    Jump

  • There are a couple of concerns with biometrics.

    The big one is, as you already mentioned, spoofing biometrics.

    The FaceID or TouchID sensor essentially saying “I got that face/fingerprint that you have in your Secure Enclave”. Granted it is a sophisticated attack, but nevertheless one you’d want to prevent if only because it’s good practice to maintain a secure chain in which the individual links can trust each other.

    For similar reasons the lockdown mode exists, which is mainly useful in limited scenarios (e.g. journalists, dissidents, etc).

    On the other hand, if ever there was a potential attacker, it would be a government because they unlimited funds in theory and it isn’t hard to imagine the FBI trying to utilize this in the San Bernardino case if it was available.

    A different risk, which would make the above quite a bit easier to accomplish, would be an altered biometrics scanner that, in addition to working the way it’s supposed to work, stores and sends off your biometrics or simply facilitates a replay attack.

  • Apple Explains Why Only USB-C AirPods Pro Support Lossless Audio With Vision Pro

    Jump

  • Lossless is understood to have a bitrate of at least 1411kbps, or about 1.4Mbps.

    Theoretical sustained bandwidth capability of Bluetooth on the 2.4Ghz spectrum is 1Mbps, but in practice it’s a chunk lower in part due to overhead.

    Even if we assume if you could just cram a higher bitrate through a smaller bandwidth (spoiler, you can’t), everyone would be up in arms about Apple lying about lossless and class action suits would ensue.

    That said, you can’t. This is not like your internet connection where you’ll just be buffering for a minute.

    As for what is and isn’t perceptible, I think you’re mixing up your tonal frequencies with your bitrates here.

  • Apple Explains Why Only USB-C AirPods Pro Support Lossless Audio With Vision Pro

    Jump

  • Honestly the most frustrating part is that there is plenty to criticize Apple on, so there’s no reason to get caught up in fabricated clickbaity nonsense.

    But instead of focusing on genuine concerns, people would rather hop on some misinformation train.

    All the while, if you espouse opinions that are bit more nuanced than “Apple bad”, then you must be a bootlicker like you said.

    It’s as if people are more concerned about missing out on joining the hype and showing off their armchair skills, rather than exercising a modicum of critical thinking.

  • We beat Apple at their own game - let the unauthorized calibrations BEGIN!

    Jump

  • Obfuscating what you have to do ≠ not providing you with a roadmap on what you have to do.

    If they didn’t obfuscate it there would be many tools out there already to let it be done.

    This is a non sequitur.

    It doesn’t automatically follow that a lack of tools means there is obfuscation. The simple fact that there can be many reasons why tools aren’t widely available alone breaks that logic.

    But I’d say the fact that we already know exactly why difficulties arise when replacing parts, definitely proves that there’s no obfuscation.

    Which again circles back to the difference between anti-repair and not pro-repair.

    Just because Apple doesn’t go out of their way to provide a roadmap and hold your hand and as a result you are having difficulties when you’re trying to do it yourself, doesn’t mean they are actively thwarting you.

    Apple doesn’t even think about you and me, their concern is to facilitate their own repair processes.

    They literally serial lock almost half of their parts.

    They don’t.

    Aside from biometrics none of the parts are serial locked.

    What you’re thinking about is parts based factory calibrated data loaded into the parts from a central database.

    Just because the system ignores the calibration data once the part doesn’t match the one the calibration was intended for, doesn’t mean it’s “locked”, it just means that you’re trying to use calibration data for the wrong part.

  • We beat Apple at their own game - let the unauthorized calibrations BEGIN!

    Jump

  • Dude has reverse engineered pretty much the entire hardware stack of Macs to be able to provide the global community with Asahi, but because he says something you disagree with he’s supposedly “uninformed”.

    Talk about childish…

  • Apple Explains Why Only USB-C AirPods Pro Support Lossless Audio With Vision Pro

    Jump

  • I’m not sure if you’re serious or trying to be sarcastic.

    Bluetooth and WiFi are two different things.

    For starters standard Bluetooth operates on 1MHz wide channels, BLE on 2MHz wide channels, whereas WiFi (nowadays) operates on 20 or 40 MHz wide channels.

    Modern Bluetooth (on 2.4Ghz) can theoretically do bursts of 2Mbps, but in practice even 1Mbps is hard to hit in a sustained fashion.

    2.4Ghz is just a frequency band and is not the same as bandwidth.

    You might as well argue that a pickup truck and a formula 1 race car should be able to reach the same top speed in the same time because their wheel distance is the same.

    I think […]

    Think again

  • We beat Apple at their own game - let the unauthorized calibrations BEGIN!

    Jump

  • Good for them, but this whole clickbait nonsense about Apple “locking” things is just that, nonsense.

    Hector Martin, creator of Asahi Linux said it best so instead of repeating his words I’ll just leave a link to his comments on the matter: https://social.treehouse.systems/@marcan/110803356645502548

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • You’re right that a lot of Terms of Service documents and similar agreement documents have language that reserves the right to modify those terms.

    At the same time just because something is in the terms doesn’t mean it can stand the test of adjudication and terms as well as changes are often challenged in court with success.

    Unity is in a particular tricky situation because the clause that governed modifications in their last ToS explicitly gives the user the option to pass on modifications that adversely affects them and stick with the old terms:

    Unity may update these Unity Software Additional Terms at any time for any reason and without notice (the “Updated Terms”) and those Updated Terms will apply to the most recent current-year version of the Unity Software, provided that, if the Updated Terms adversely impact your rights, you may elect to continue to use any current-year versions of the Unity Software (e.g., 2018.x and 2018.y and any Long Term Supported (LTS) versions for that current-year release) according to the terms that applied just prior to the Updated Terms (the “Prior Terms”). The Updated Terms will then not apply to your use of those current-year versions unless and until you update to a subsequent year version of the Unity Software (e.g. from 2019.4 to 2020.1). If material modifications are made to these Terms, Unity will endeavor to notify you of the modification. If a modification is required to comply with applicable law, the modification will apply notwithstanding this section. Except as explicitly set forth in this paragraph, your use of any new version or release of the Unity Software will be subject to the Updated Terms applicable to that release or version. You understand that it is your responsibility to maintain complete records establishing your entitlement to Prior Terms.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20201111183311/https://github.com/Unity-Technologies/TermsOfService/blob/master/Unity%20Software%20Additional%20Terms.md

  • Kim Davis must pay $100,000 to US same-sex couple she denied marriage license

    Jump

  • I was wondering myself as well so I got you.

    Basically what happened was that these were technically two separate cases with two separate jury pools to decide the amount for damages.

    One jury pool came to the decision that there were damages and awarded $50k to each individual in couple 1 (totaling $100k) while the other jury pool independently decided that no damages should be awarded based on the same evidence.

    Keep in mind that this region is generally pretty hostile towards LGBTQ+ people. The judge had the option to overrule a jury if they find that the decision doesn’t match the evidence in the case.

    The lawyer of this lady is actually hoping for that in the case that lead to a $100k damages award as per the quote below.

    “Two juries heard the same evidence and the same arguments, and only one jury returned a verdict that was based on the facts and the evidence presented at trial,” Daniel Schmid, senior litigation counsel for Liberty Counsel and one of Davis’ attorneys, told CNN via email. “In the Yates case, the jury returned a verdict of $0.00 because that is what the evidence required.”

    “Without any evidentiary support, the Ermold jury reached a verdict of $50,000 for each plaintiff. The evidence presented at trial simply does not support that verdict, and Ms. Davis will be filing a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict next week,” Schmid said. “Ms. Davis trusts that the courts reviewing the evidence presented will see that the Ermold verdict lacks any evidentiary support and will agree with the Yates jury that the plaintiffs are entitled to no damages whatsoever.”

    Source

  • Wyze security camera owners reported that they could briefly see feeds from cameras they didn’t own

    Jump

  • You can still do this if you use https://www.shodan.io/

    It’ll let you find IoT devices and cameras connected to the internet if you know what to search for and an alarming amount of them are locked behind an admin/admin login.

    I advise against nosying around because there’s a near 100% chance that it’s illegal to do so in your jurisdiction.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Oh wow, they really closed it down huh?

    Not too long ago you were able to change it.

    This dumbing things down to prevent customers from fucking themselves over and using up CS resources is getting ridiculous.

    Say you need to change some settings but your modem/router isn’t online then you’re SOOL.

    Cox, who uses the same gateway, is even worse. They won’t even allow you to enable legacy mode (802.11b) for IoT devices that cheaped out on WiFi cards, not even on a separate network and their customer service can’t enable it either.

    I dread moving into a Cox region where there’s no fiber competitor available.

  • The IRS plans to crack down on 1,600 millionaires to collect millions of dollars in back taxes

    Jump

  • Love the fear mongering for something that A) already happens, B) shouldn't be an issue for people that are in the up and up and C) should be music to the ears of members of the "law and order" party.

  • Todd Howard asked on-air why Bethesda didn't optimise Starfield for PC: 'We did [...] you may need to upgrade your PC'

    Jump

  • Instead of cracking jokes he should improve the piss poor optimization.

    Can’t even render 50fps consistently on a Strix 3090OC at 1620p (accounting for resolution scale), what a joke.

    Edit: Scratch that, it’s even worse, averaging around 40 fps with HUB Quality settings, so not even on Ultra and my 12900K is nowhere near bottlenecking.

    What a joke.

  • Ashton Kutcher, Mila Kunis Wrote Letters in Support of Danny Masterson Ahead of Rape Sentencing; Kutcher Called Him a ‘Role Model’

    Jump

  • I get asking for mercy for family or a close friend, even when they’ve committed crimes, heinous or otherwise. I’ll chalk that up to human emotions.

    But ffs, read the room a bit.

    His dedication to leading a drug-free life and the genuine care he extends to others make him an outstanding role model and friend.

    One of the most remarkable aspects of Danny’s character is his unwavering commitment to discouraging the use of drugs.

    His dedication to avoiding all substances has inspired not only me but also countless others in our circle. Danny’s steadfastness in promoting a drug-free lifestyle has been a guiding light in my journey through the entertainment world and has helped me prioritize my well-being and focus on make responsible choices.

    Saying stuff like that when he’s convicted of drugging victims before taping them is just nuts. Even by some sense of stupidity you think you’re just trying to highlight that he’s not a habitual drug user, you’re essentially just highlighting how calculated his actions were by drugging his victims.

  • A three-judge panel has blocked Alabama’s congressional districts, ordering new lines drawn

    Jump

  • Agreed.

    Hold them in contempt of court and let them spend a week in jail all expenses paid.

    They’re just trying to run out the clock so that, come election time, they’ll throw their hands up in the air and go “Welp, guess we’ll have to use the old map”.

    Having a special master draw up a map is great in theory, until SCOTUS stays the lower ruling and drawn map and decides to not rule on the case until after elections (if they even were inclined to rule in favor of a fair map to begin with).

  • Young climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stance

    Jump

  • Cue the nuclear shills that will handwave away any legitimate concern with wishful thinking and frame the discussion as solely pro/anti fossil, conveniently pretending that renewables don’t exist.

    ETA:

    Let's look at some great examples of handwaving and other nonsense to further the nuclear agenda.

    Here @danielbln@lemmy.world brings up a legitimate concern about companies not adhering to regulation and regulators being corrupt/bought *cough… Three Mile Island cough*, and how to deal with that:

    So uh, turns out the energy companies are not exactly the most moral and rule abiding entities, and they love to pay off politicians and cut corners. How does one prevent that, as in the case of fission it has rather dire consequences?

    So of course the answer to that by @Carighan@lemmy.world is a slippery slope argument and equating a hypothetical disaster with thousands if not millions of victims and areas being uninhabitable for years to come, with the death of a family member due to faulty wiring in your home:

    Since you can apply that logic to everything, how can you ever build anything? Because all consequences are dire on a myopic scale, that is, if your partner dies because a single electrician cheaped out with the wiring in your building and got someone to sign off, "It's not as bad as a nuclear disaster" isn't exactly going to console them much.

    At some point, you need to accept that making something illegal and trying to prosecute people has to be enough. For most situations. It's not perfect. Sure. But nothing ever is. And no solution to energy is ever going to be perfect, either.

    Then there's the matter of misleading statistics and graphs.Never mind the fact that the amount of victims of nuclear disasters is underreported, under-attributed and research is hampered if not outright blocked to further a nuclear agenda, also never mind that the risks are consistently underreported, lets leave those contentious points behind and look at what's at hand.

    Here @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works shows a graph from Our World in Data that is often thrown around and claims to show "Death rates by unit of electricity production":

    Seems shocking enough and I'm sure in rough lines, the proportions respective to one another make sense to some degree or another.The problem however is that the source data is thrown together in such a way that it completely undermines the message the graph is trying to portray.

    According to Our World in Data this is the source of the data used in the graph:

    Death rates from energy production is measured as the number of deaths by energy source per terawatt-hour (TWh) of electricity production.

    Data on death rates from fossil fuels is sourced from Markandya, A., & Wilkinson, P. (2007).

    Data on death rates from solar and wind is sourced from Sovacool et al. (2016) based on a database of accidents from these sources.

    We estimate deaths rates for nuclear energy based on the latest death toll figures from Chernobyl and Fukushima as described in our article here: https://ourworldindata.org/what-was-the-death-toll-from-chernobyl-and-fukushima

    We estimate death rates from hydropower based on an updated list of historical hydropower accidents, dating back to 1965, sourced primarily from the underlying database included in Sovacool et al. (2016). For more information, see our article: https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy

    Fossil fuel numbers are based on this paper which starts out by described a pro-nuclear stance, but more importantly, does a lot of educated guesstimating on the air-pollution related death numbers that is straight up copied into the graph.

    Sovacool is used for solar and wind, but doesn't have those estimates and is mainly limited to direct victims.

    Nuclear based deaths is based on Our World in Data's own nuclear propaganda piece that mainly focuses on direct deaths and severely underplays non-direct deaths.

    And hydropower bases deaths is based on accidents.

    So they mix and match all kinds of different forms of data to make this graph, which is a no-no. Either you stick to only accidents, only direct deaths or do all possible deaths that is possibly caused by an energy source, like they do for fossil fuels.

    Not doing so makes the graph seem like some kind of joke.

  • Elon Musk’s FSD v12 demo includes a near miss at a red light and doxxing Mark Zuckerberg — 45-minute video was meant to demonstrate v12 of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving but ended up being a list of thi...

    Jump

  • Most doxxers don't technically release the information, rather they've acquired it and point others to where they've acquired it or simply disseminate it further.

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    The Afterparty S02E05 - Sebastian - Episode Discussion

  • Programmer Humor @programming.dev
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    When IT insists on autogenerated email addresses…

  • Programmer Humor @lemmy.ml
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    When IT insists on autogenerated email addresses…

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Foundation S02E02 - A Glimpse of Darkness - Episode Discussion

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    The Afterparty S02E03 - Travis - Episode Discussion

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Weekly “What are you watching” Megathread - Week of Monday July 17, 2023

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Foundation S02E01 - In Sheldon’s Shadow - Episode Discussion

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    The Afterparty S02E02 - Grace- Episode Discussion

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    The Afterparty S02E01 - Aniq 2: The Sequel - Episode Discussion

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Foundation — Season 2 Official Trailer 2 | Apple TV+

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Napoleon — Official Trailer

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    The Afterparty Season 2 ARG tie-in website: Edgar & Grace's Wedding Site

    edgarandgracewedding.com
  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Foundation — Season 1 Recap in Three Minutes | Apple TV+

  • Silo TV & Book Series @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev
    TV Spoilers

    So who are your favorite and least favorite characters on the TV Show and why?

  • Apple TV+ Community @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Weekly “What are you watching” Megathread - Week of Monday July 10, 2023

  • Reddit @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Evidence found that a pro-admin ChatGPT driven astroturfing campaign took place on r/Programming

  • Apple Vision Pro @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Report: Vision Pro Headset's Complex Design Forcing Apple to Make 'Drastic' Production Cuts

    www.macrumors.com /2023/07/03/apple-vision-pro-drastic-production-cuts/
  • Apple Vision Pro @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Realistic VR

  • Apple Vision Pro @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    Apple Vision Pro Cost Breakdown - How much Vision Pro costs for Apple?

  • Apple Vision Pro @lemmy.world
    lazyvar @programming.dev

    People already considering driving around with Apple Vision Pro