I mean that someone saw hostile architecture and then decided to photoshop a trans flag over it for political reasons.
We, as strangers, will never know their exact motivation, but I think if their idea was a message regarding the unfair treatment of economically disadvantaged people or neoliberal hypocrisy, there would be much better ways to communicate the issue, that don't involve something that can easily be construed as anti-trans messaging.
It's a bit vibes based, but you know.... people ain't robots, and even if that wasn't the original intent, that's how the message comes across. And I'd rather have a better, more poignant statement that's worth repeating, rather than this, perhaps unintentionally, bad one.
Especially because people will take this at face value and there are more photoshopped images just like this, making the whole thing a bit sussy, imo.
As a German, I feel like, we should be capable of seeing 10th of thousands of people die, including reporters, aid workers and literal children, and fathom that this…
is bad.
Hab einen Vorschlag:Wir nehmen ein existentes Konzept für ein gelöstes Problem.Dass benennen wir dann um, sodass es futuristisch und neu klingt.Anschließend ent-lösen wir es, indem wir super geringe Energiedichte mit maximaler Ineffizienz kombinieren.Und wir nutzen unsere Lösung in einem Bereich, wo sich die bisherige Lösung nicht durchsetzen konnte, weil sie für diesen Use-Case die schlechtest-denkbare Lösung ist.Wissing (FDP) gibt uns 150 Mio.
I honestly don't understand how someone can take this or OP's post as a serious statement. I feel like both are extremely obvious jokes.
It's like a line I like to say:
"I'm the smartest, prettiest, most humble person in the world." No one has ever taken that seriously, and for good reason. It's not meant to be.
Instead, I have to advocate for my existence in front of people who look down on me and have to rely on the understanding and kindness of strangers and the zeitgeist to make me be safe.
I'm barely allowed to marry who I love, and many people still reject "marriage" as a concept for people like me. I was once chased by someone with a knife for holding a loved one's hand.
People fought tooth and nail for us to be recognized. Many are still forced to do so. Sure, take the fucking rainbow. Take it for granted, just like you do with everything else.
I am unable to play any 4K Blu-ray I bought. Thanks, DRM and IntelSGX for that. And according to German law, it would be a criminal offense to circumvent the protections on the plastic disc I own.
I'm not saying I'd ever pirate anything.
I'm just saying that it's objectively better, cheaper, easier and arguably less criminal than my other options.
This image is so old I had it on my mp3 player, when I was a kid. (Don't ask why, we'll both just cringe) He just has very thick legs, so he can do all the cool parkouring, I imagined him doing, while sitting in the backseat of my parents car, listening to Nightwish and Subway To Sally.
I've been using Linux for more than a decade now as my daily driver.
Count me as 'basic' and 'just starting', because I quite like the colorful, clicky and nicely animated version, where I don't have to remember anything and that works just as well.
And now out of my way, while I happily point, click and scroll to adjust my displays brightness, which is entirely possible through the terminal, but I'm not ridiculous or insecure enough for that.
I don't get why you get so much downvotes, because it's not as obvious as people make it out to be and there are plenty of adapters. So it's a good question.
But yes. The 3.5mm jack had the thing companies say they are striving for: simplicity.
DACs are nice and everything but the phone can just decide to not connect properly. The DAC can decide it had enough of your phone. In either case you'd need to reconnect them. And that means unlocking your phone, because a secure phone will block streaming to 'unknown' USB-C devices, unless it's unlocked during the negotiation phase. And if your connectors have become wonky for whatever reason: Well, no music for you.
And then there's the issue where you have to have them at hand when you need them. In your car, on your person, while at work.
3.5mm is great because it actually "just works".
One of the few things that can claim such thing.
This may be off topic, but it's sadly not a common occurence to see someone correct something "a bit misleading", while acknowledging that the point is still valid.
I'm not sure how it is now, but when I was still dual booting I had the same problem until I got a separate drive for Linux instead of just using different partitions of the same drive.
Und ich hab mich neulich schon drüber aufgeregt, dass irgendwelche FridaysForHubraums gerne mal den Notausschalter an Ladesäulen betätigen.
…oder dass die Stadt bei Bauarbeiten gerne vergisst, dass es auch sowas wie Fußgänger und Radfahrer gibt, welche man nicht einfach mal ohne Ampel über eine 4-spurige Straße schicken sollte.
…oder dass Radwege nicht durch mehrere Spuren gefädelt werden sollten.
…oder das Parkplätze direkt an Fußgängerüberwegen richtig kacke sind, weil die Sicht auf annähernde Autos/Fußgänger bereits durch einen Transporter komplett verdeckt wird.
…oder dass es keine gute Idee ist wenn Radfahrer vom Ampelsensor nicht beachtet werden, weswegen die nur grün bekommen, wenn sie etwas auf die Kreuzung fahren, sodass das Auto hinter ihnen den Sensor auslösen kann.
Jedenfalls, fahrt vorsichtig.
Auf Rücksicht oder selbst Toleranz anderer darf man scheinbar nicht hoffen.
I mean that someone saw hostile architecture and then decided to photoshop a trans flag over it for political reasons.
We, as strangers, will never know their exact motivation, but I think if their idea was a message regarding the unfair treatment of economically disadvantaged people or neoliberal hypocrisy, there would be much better ways to communicate the issue, that don't involve something that can easily be construed as anti-trans messaging.
It's a bit vibes based, but you know.... people ain't robots, and even if that wasn't the original intent, that's how the message comes across. And I'd rather have a better, more poignant statement that's worth repeating, rather than this, perhaps unintentionally, bad one.
Especially because people will take this at face value and there are more photoshopped images just like this, making the whole thing a bit sussy, imo.