Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
15
Comments
226
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • This is not a slight nuance, it literally makes touchscreen unusable for me. Touchscreen really helps with carpal tunnel and RSI, which is more important to me than an ideological war against Google.

  • The deceleration is way too low and it's hard to get it to focus where I want on the page fast. The deceleration is inconsistent between touchscreen and touchpad, which works fine. I tried looking around for configurations for it but couldn't find any. Touchscreen support in Chrome is just generally better

  • Does this apply to all Chromium based browsers? I would like to switch to Firefox, but the touchscreen scroll there is terrible, and that is 90% of what I do in a browser.

  • Here's a crazy idea to make your population grow: how about not sending your people to die in a war?

  • All problems mentioned are societal issues

    Exactly. This follows Marx's theory of alienation closely. I found 3 out of 4 features described by Marx in the original article.

  • I would say the rocket is ready for billionaires who want to beta test it.

  • I really wish LinkedIn would add an anonymous cringe emoji. I would use it on like 90% of the content on that site.

  • We are committed to creating value for our customers and shareholders.

    Fixed a typo in the report

  • They should make a discount for every person the self driving software hits. That shit would be basically free.

  • And shorter games should naturally command a lower price

    This is exactly the thing that doesn't make any sense. Should The Last of Us be priced at a fraction of The Witcher 3 because it is shorter? What about Bioshock? It's half the length of The Last of Us 2

  • I've often come across this sentiment in Steam reviews and it's very reductive to judge games based mainly on this metric. Getting older I have less time for videogames and I value shorter games more. There are games that are extremely valuable because of their high quality even if very short, like the first Portal.

    This is why we have companies like Ubisoft trying to game the system constantly with low quality content to pad the game to 100 hours or whatever is fashionable in open world these days. I will take 6 hours of quality single player anytime over 100 hours of AssCreed grinding and ridiculous 'story'

  • Pretty cool when I need autocompletion, but it really messes with my zsh config so I won't be using it all the time

  • Fig looks really cool, but it's Mac only

  • This year's Unity story sums up my discontent with tech nicely. Impressive tech made by extremely talented people, botched by incompetent corporate parasites who care only about securing their millions.

  • Best Supergiant game. But I wouldn't call it underrated: it was a big hit when it landed. I has also aged really well with some very creative mechanics.

  • ToME is amazing! One of my favorite games in my library

  • I really hope Chrome gets its shit together and stabilizes the chrome.processes API during my lifetime so I or someone can make an extension that autokills or at least warns you about these shitty pages.

  • This type of nostalgia porn is pretty popular on Youtube, but usually they at least make some valid point. Not in this case though.

    It's also funny how Skyrim is presented as one of the 'cool' games, glossing over the fact that it has a massive, slow exposition dump at the beginning, which was criticized ever since it launched.