Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
3
Comments
760
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • If you want a sample of how crazy Chinese history can get look at the Tai Ping rebellion:

    • Student fails Civil Servant Exam for the third time and has a mental breakdown
    • starts claiming he's Jesus' little brother who trained him to fight demons in his dreams
    • more dead than WWI
  • That's the most cut and dry example of copy-left license violation imaginable. This would even be a violation of a GPLv2 license. It's like they had zero idea what that license meant.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • He's clearly a centrist.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Is this Tyler Robinson?

  • No, there still are real people on twitter, unfortunately, particularly elites and journalists who were the main reason why twitter ever mattered. Anyone else though can safely assumed to be bots if they have a blue check mark.

    If they don't have a blue check mark then they don't have paid api access, meaning their either an extremely advanced bot system that can circumvent twitters bot prevention, or they're a real person.

  • All blue check marks. Anyone who's actually paid for verification on Twitter is most likely a bot completely reversing it's point. Someone without a check mark is more likely to be a real person.

  • Like half the population of this site exists because Reddit locked down their API. It's an empirical fact that they engage in bot detection and prevention. Anyone who consistently uses a VPN will have personal experience with it. Anyone who's tried to interact with a social media's API can tell you that. Try to write a bot that scrapes Facebook events or LinkedIn profiles before you speak in such absolutes.

    You are correct that they don't aim to completely eliminate them. They might even explicitly allow some of them. But If they didn't engage in any bot management you'd see nothing but spam for "hot 21yos in your area" on every site. Depending on the platform they might offer paid API access to facilitate those influence networks (eg X.com blue checks). Even if they did that they'd engage in bot prevention for bots that aren't paying.

  • Nothing porksnort said implied social media wanted total elimination of the bot networks. The methods listed are accurate ways they will stop unwanted traffic.

  • Again?!

    Jump
  • The messages indicated he was terminally online meme lord but if you think that's exclusive to groupers then your not really connected with the youth. "If your reading this, you're gay" isn't any sort of political statement.

  • Again?!

    Jump
  • Where did you see that?

  • Again?!

    Jump
  • Are people really buying this line that Robinson was a groyper? I've seen absolutely no evidence to back this up other than he was white male. It's like libs would rather believe that conspiracy than just accept that someone killed Kirk for all the vile hatred that he spread.

  • Yeah. Further evidence of that was Crooks would've been a school shooter but decided to do something better with his life.

  • About as politically coherent as Luigi.

  • --noconfirm

  • Any word yet if this is private equity stripping the copper or are they just morons?

  • No its a barrel of hard tack (aka crackers). Supposed to be old timely grocery store version of a water cooler.

  • There's also a little hole in the base of the handle that can fill the handle with water while your cleaning it.

  • They probably can just block IPs of foreign DNS but I suspect there's ways of mirroring around that.