I'm thinking seriously about using something like a Daylight tablet as a thin client for a more powerful machine at home. Obviously doing real coding by hand would still suck, but LLM-based coding might actually be viable.
Yes absolutely. Also not a historian, but AIUI that's probably the largest factor in the overall boom for the US economy at the time.
I didn't mean to claim that the US was ever a peaceful nation. The best I could say is that the US sat out from the world wars until they had both (1) a way to sell war to the public and (2) a clear financial interest. Post-WWII, every US war has been a bullshit war.
I also don't mean to sound positive about capitalism. My only real point was that for a brief period, (white) workers actually had an OK social contract with the ruling class. It didn't last long at all in the grand scheme, and was probably a fluke, not real evidence that capitalism works.
That's not entirely true. We had a brief period after WWII until the 70s when the middle class actually existed, the rich were taxed at 91%, and unions had leverage. This has eroded quickly since the dawn of neoliberalism.
This person will never know how stupid and self-righteous they sound. It's always the religious nuts that think everyone must shut up and listen to their vapid drivel.
EDIT: I don't think the comment really violated rule 1, but there was apparently a followup comment that definitely did, and this one just got removed by association. Here's a very slightly paraphrased version of it that should not break the rules:
Gish gallop of [explitive].
A) overblown, and that argues for cleaner power, better cooling, and more efficient models
B) regulation failure
C) incorrect, they have made discoveries that humans have been unable to. All human knowledge is built off previous knowledge.
D) the enemy is both weak and strong. If they don’t produce anything good then the people who are losing their jobs can’t have either, right?
E) small study based on one task which people are misrepresenting. The actual evidence shows it makes people smarter as they shift priorities.
F) only for vulnerable people. Better safeguards are needed for the weak minded.
G) argument against using people’s likeness not ai
H) use an open source Chinese model
I) market distortion problem, not a principled reason no one should use the technology any more than GPU shortages made all graphics work illegitimate.
J) see (H)
K) try one argument next time. Your best one, [some snarky sarcasm]
War powers resolution is a defensive exception to the rule:
The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
I'm thinking seriously about using something like a Daylight tablet as a thin client for a more powerful machine at home. Obviously doing real coding by hand would still suck, but LLM-based coding might actually be viable.