Most Stone Age human societies routinely practiced infanticide, and estimates of children killed by infanticide in the Mesolithic and Neolithic eras vary from 15 to 50 percent. Infanticide continued to be common in most societies after the historical era began, including ancient Greece, ancient Rome, the Phoenicians, ancient China, ancient Japan, Pre-Islamic Arabia, Aboriginal Australia, Native Americans, and Native Alaskans.
Shouting "I'm going to kill the president of the United States" in front of the White House will not lead to you being arrested, provided you have zero intention to pull through with it? It is nothing but speech after all.
The symbol you meant to use is the implication arrow: =>
Trans women => women
Cis women => women
Black women => women
Lesbian women => women
This means: If the left statement is true, the right statement must also be true. If the left statement is false, you don't know whether the right statement is true or false.
Killing 50% of any one people is genocide, right? For example, the Nazis killed up to 50% of European Romani people and it is classified as a genocide.
Let's assume killing 50% of n peoples is genocide.
Since killing 50% of n peoples is genocide, killing 50% of n+1 peoples must also be genocide, else a number N would exist such that killing 50% of N - 1 peoples is genocide but killing 50% of N peoples is not. The existence of such a number N would be quite contradictory, as it would imply one could undo genocide by killing more people. Additionally, if one were to first kill 50% of N - 1 people and then kill 50% of one more people some time later, both events would be classified as genocide, since killing 50% of one people is assumed to be genocide.
Homöopathie ist nichts als massenhafter Betrug, der von den Nazis stark gefördert wurde.
Wenn die BW Grünen aber gegen Homöopathie vorgehen wird die BW CDU wahrscheinlich 40% der Stimmen bekommen und alles wird nur noch schlimmer hier in BW. Die Grünen sind ja schon so schwarz wie möglich, ich möchte nicht, dass die CDU noch mehr Einfluss bekommt.
I don't quite understand the point you're trying to make. I responded to a comment stating:
"The JEWS™ are destroying Jesus's homelands just like they killed him, why is any Christian supporting the Jews™???"
Additionally, the comment conflates Palestine (region) with Palestine (country). Israel is currently destroying and invading Palestine (country). Israel has controlled large parts of Palestine (region) for many decades and has ethnically cleansed those parts of many non-Jewish Palestinians (region) who have mostly fled into neighboring countries, including Palestine (country).
What I'm trying to say is: It's a contradiction to argue Israel is destroying Jesus's homelands because Israel has controlled large parts of Palestine (region) for 80 years. They would've either destroyed his homelands already or they wouldn't have. If it's the former, Israel cannot destroy "Jesus's homelands" anymore. If it's the latter, you're implying that the current borders of Palestine (country) is "Jesus's homelands" - which is false, as Palestine (country) only controls a portion of Palestine (region).
This is clear-cut Christian antisemitism, the justification for more than a millenia of discrimination and ultimately culminating in the Holocaust. You are implying present day Jews have the collective responsibility of killing Jesus.
Also, you are equating Judaism with Israel, which is done by both zionists and antisemites.
are trying to destroy his homeland and take it over
Palestine the country is not Palestine the region. Israel has control over large parts of Palestine, the region. Palestine, the country, does not. Jesus lived in Palestine, the region. Jesus did not live in Palestine, the country or modern-day Israel, the country. His "homelands" have not existed for nearly two millenia since they have been taken over countless of times, be it the British, the Ottomans, the Crusaders and everyone before that.
Don't look into any details if you want to keep that opinion
Only adults may consume and/or own cannabis
No buying, selling or giving away weed
Only consuming cannabis you or your Cannabis Social Club (CSC), should you join one, grew is allowed. In a CSC cannabis may be grown and sold to its members
CSCs may not make profits
No more than 50 (30 if you are younger than 21) grams of cannabis per month may be handed out to you by your CSC
No cannabis with more than 10% THC may be handed out to people younger than 21
Consuming cannabis within 100 meters (visual range) of a playground, school, youth center, public sports facilities or CSCs is prohibited
Consuming cannabis between 7am and 8pm in a pedestrian zone is prohibited
Consuming cannabis "close" to minors is prohibited
No CSC may be established within 200 meters of a school or playground
max 500 members per CSC
no more than 1 CSC per 6000 city residents (or 1 CSC if the city/town has less than 6000 residents)
no extracting THC from cannabis
no owning more than 3 cannabis plants
no owning more than 50 grams of dried cannabis, including plants
no carrying around more than 25 grams of dried cannabis, including plants
CSCs have to keep meticulous records about their members, who received when how much cannabis and how much cannabis grew in total
police can just go and take these records without requiring a judge's approval
for the coming months: no driving a car or bicycle with more than 1 ng of THC in your blood or you will lose your car driver's license and pay a fine (yes, even if you're caught riding your bicycle, you will lose your car driver's license). Fun fact: the police announced they will significantly increase controls
Wikipedia: Infanticide