Aatube

@ Aatube @kbin.melroy.org

Posts

431
Comments

3712
Joined

2 yr. ago

[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others' words. Weird, isn't it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0

Moderating

Uplifting News lemmy.world

Avoid5 sh.itjust.works

4d ago

Deleted

[solved] Does Linux have an equivalent to "Compress contents to save disk space" from Windows? I don't need it to save space, just please read the full post before commenting.
Jump
Aatube @kbin.melroy.org 4d ago
well what you said after zir reply didn't demonstrate any of that

4d ago

[solved] Does Linux have an equivalent to "Compress contents to save disk space" from Windows? I don't need it to save space, just please read the full post before commenting.

that you write things i'm trying to understand the relevance of, like "This information wasn’t provided in the post." and "the first comment points to btrfs". The Reddit link you gave also points towards btrfs as well as very undetailed mentions of zfs. ze says "i've tried btrfs and it doesn't work so i'm looking into zfs", and you reply "use btrfs use btrfs or look into zfs", a message whose helpfulness I struggle to understand.

Another researcher, Davi Ottenheimer, pointed out that the security section (Section 3, pages 47-53) of Anthropic's 244-page documentation "contains no count of zero-days at all. With no CVE list, no CVSS distribution, no severity bucket, no disclosure timeline, no vendor-confirmed-novel table, no false-positive rate."

excerpts from the summary of the post linked in "Devanash ultimately concluded", a lot of which Register repeats (which I think is a good thing since the copyediting makes the language a lot more accessible and wide-reaching and of course it was credited):

The bugs are real. 17-year-old FreeBSD RCE, 23-year-old Linux kernel heap overflow, 27-year-old OpenBSD TCP flaw. LLMs catch these because they can reason about the gap between what code does and what the developer intended. Fuzzers and static analysis literally cannot do this.
The coverage is wrong on almost every detail. The “181 Firefox exploits” ran with the browser sandbox ( yes, the thing that stops browser exploits) off. The FreeBSD exploit transcript shows substantial human guidance, not autonomy. The “thousands of severe vulnerabilities” extrapolates from 198 manually reviewed reports. The Linux kernel bug was found by Opus 4.6, the public model, not Mythos.
The moat is thinner than anyone reported. AISLE tested eight models including a 3.6B model at $0.11/M tokens. All eight found the FreeBSD bug. Mythos’s actual lead is in multi-step exploit development, not detection. That’s a narrower and more replicable advantage than what’s being sold.