The initiative was very clear that there is no expectation of support from the developers after support has ended. There was nothing vague about it except for the disinformation PirateSoftware was putting out.
Mainstream linux distros are currently easier to use than it is to debloat a windows install. Quite a few of my "normie" friends swapped to Linux because it was easier to use than Windows when all you do is play games and browse the web.
Just recently I built a backup-backup server out of a 2009 AMD Athlon CPU. Tried to run a DB via docker on it but could not as the CPU does not support newer instructions used by docker
There have been instances where I have seen such behaviour , but it has almost always boiled down to ISP hardware in a very specific location. Multiple different devices in different locations? Most likely user error
It is cheap as long as you don't need to restore your data. Downloading data from S3 costs a lot.
OP asked about 56TB of storage, for which data retrieval would cost about 4.7k
Based on the research they had a 60 something % accuracy. But the test data was for HackerNews accounts which linked to LinkedIn. I would guess that anyone linking their anonymous account to their LinkedIn profile isn't really trying to hide themselves.
I need the lore