My guess after listening to the gaslighting little shithead was that the report probably showed that all views under the big tent can't be equally served to deliver a Democrat victory, so he's going to pull the same shit of telling one group of voters that the Dems will deliver for them, while telling another group that the Dems will deliver something mutually exclusive of the first group. It sounded like Martin was trying to pander by delivering only what "lessons" he thought each group of organizers needed to hear to win their block of voters without entertaining the idea that Favreau was suggesting that maybe we need to have the messy debate about whether the DNC platform can hold everyone's positions (and by "everyone" i just mean enough voters to win an election). Or maybe Martin is just a simple man.
I tried signing up for eHarmony, back when that was a thing. I find it funny now because I'm happily married, but when I set up my profile the website basically told me that it couldn't match me with anyone. Felt like shit for a while, but then I realized it's the apps that are full of shit. Meeting people doesn't take an app, and sometimes the apps proactively make meeting people more difficult.
The guy was denied by a judge (J Arguellas) appointed by a republican governor, though his (the judge's) position is designated as non-partisan. Just for a little context.
Yeah, firefighters are in the same class as lifeguards. They're protecting people from forces of nature, and don't have any ideology that is central to their work other than "save lives".
Thanks for the response. I phrased the original question rather poorly, but I was glad to learn a bit about the FIDE World Cup. I hope for the safety of this year's Cadidates' tournament.
Thank you. A few of the responses made me realize that I didn't phrase the question very well initially. I appreciate the response, and I think the sentiment you shared is at the center of my question.
I phrased the question poorly, and should have clarified that I was asking if anyone that had planned to attend a match was reconsidering. Maybe I'll edit it later, and I appreciate the response.
Thanks for the response. I work in an area where the my bosses are frantically trying to "get ready" for the massive crowds anticipated for World Cup, and lately I've been wondering why anyone, much less a crowd, would be planning to travel to the US if they didn't absolutely have to.
This is absolutely bullshit, but also half-assed cowardice. Like if you're going to put dead people who cannot consent to the use of their image in your project, why not make Martin Luther King Jr the next T'challa in the MCU? Why not make Pope Benedict fight the mandelorian?
My guess after listening to the gaslighting little shithead was that the report probably showed that all views under the big tent can't be equally served to deliver a Democrat victory, so he's going to pull the same shit of telling one group of voters that the Dems will deliver for them, while telling another group that the Dems will deliver something mutually exclusive of the first group. It sounded like Martin was trying to pander by delivering only what "lessons" he thought each group of organizers needed to hear to win their block of voters without entertaining the idea that Favreau was suggesting that maybe we need to have the messy debate about whether the DNC platform can hold everyone's positions (and by "everyone" i just mean enough voters to win an election). Or maybe Martin is just a simple man.