I tried it, I like it!
- Posts
- 14
- Comments
- 117
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 14
- Comments
- 117
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
Bristol, UK @lemmy.ml Bristol Zoo campaigner's event cancelled by Bristol Beacon who then tried to silence him
Linux Phones @lemmy.ca Reporting Google to the Competition & Markets Authority (UK): Android Developer Verification
movies @piefed.social What are your favourite books about movies?
Selfhosted @lemmy.world Securing a 'public' service for family
Cars - For Car Enthusiasts @lemmy.world Are there any external shade covers/frost shields that wraparound car windscreen and front windows?
Nintendo @lemmy.world IGN Donkey Kong Bonanza Review
Bristol, UK @lemmy.ml BBC News - RAC: Busiest UK airports raise kiss-and-fly fees
Selfhosted @lemmy.world Photo management - storing friends' photos
Bristol, UK @lemmy.ml BBC: St Michael's Hospital fire 'started in solar panels'
VoxeLibre @lemm.ee Pillager Outpost - how to stop pillagers spawning?
Bristol, UK @lemmy.ml YouGov WECA Mayor Poll
Bash @lemmy.ml 255 return code from command substitution of wait builtin but why?
Bristol, UK @lemmy.ml How was Storm Darragh for you?
Linux @lemmy.ml Photo management at the cmdline - recommendations?

Synching will create a conflict file when this happens. Nothing is lost but a user must look out for these files and merge manually.
KeepassXC has its own merge logic and will happily absorb changes to a file on disk whilst open. However if two offline machines both change a database then you will get a conflict file and will have to ask keepass to merge them.