Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)J

JoeyJoeJoeJr

@ JoeyJoeJoeJr @lemmy.ml

Posts
8
Comments
152
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Should I tell my dad that his mistake almost cost me a fortune?

    Jump

  • What would you do if he wasn't your dad? You mentioned you took full blame, almost as if you felt like you were covering for him, but I think even if it wasn't your dad, you're responsible for anyone you bring in, and the work they do, so taking the blame should be universal. And going forward, I'd expect a similar, universal approach. You could choose to not mention it but also not employ that person any more, mention it before the next job and ask them to be extra careful, change procedures to guarantee it doesn't happen again...

    I don't think him being your dad should necessarily afford him special treatment.

  • Leak confirms GrapheneOS & Motorola partnership for non-Pixel hardware

    Jump

  • They were, briefly. Google sold them pretty shortly after buying them. If I recall correctly, the noise at the time indicated it was all about getting IP - they bought the company to get access to patents that I think they kept, when they sold the rest of it on to Lenovo.

  • That's How

    Jump

  • $30/hour is about $60K/year.

    That's an absolutely livable wage in NYC. You might need a roommate, but it's easily achievable. I lived there for almost a decade (recently), but since you shouldn't trust random people on the internet, here's the MIT living wage calculator:

    As a single adult with no kids, you're just barely under the "living" wage in most of those, but well above "poverty" in all of them. In any borough, with a roommate, you're cruising comfortably (see the "2 Adults (Both Working): 0 Children" column). In the Bronx, as a single adult with no kids, $30 is above the living wage mark.

    It's also worth noting, people may live outside the city, but take a train or subway in for work. Living just outside the city brings costs down quite a bit.

  • Why is Ireland Covered in Pointless Buildings?

    Jump

  • The title is a bit of a joke against the thumbnail - "pointless" here means "purposeless." The video is about structures built that do not serve a traditional function, e.g. they exist only for aesthetics, or just to make someone "earn" money rather than donating money.

  • Videos @lemmy.world
    JoeyJoeJoeJr @lemmy.ml

    Why is Ireland Covered in Pointless Buildings?

  • I'm afraid that points has become an evil presence in our home [Hard]

    Jump

  • So, you've decided to steal cable...

  • Soviet parachute troops jump off of a TB-3 bomber (yes, OFF of, not out of), 1937

    Jump

  • JD Vance repeats comments he wants wife Usha to convert to Christianity

    Jump

  • This isn't newsworthy. I'm not a fan of Vance at all, but his comments here aren't even bad. If you read the article, the comments boil down to: "I believe this, I wish she did too, it's fine if she never does, I love her regardless." It's honestly pretty healthy to be able to have that in a relationship.

    This is practically at the level of criticizing Obama's tan suit, and is just noise and distraction in a news cycle filled with actually bad things (multiple wars, the government shutdown, measles outbreaks, a hurricane, etc). Don't spread this nonsense. It's fodder for the other side to call people out for being focused on ridiculous, unfounded slights, and allows them to not pay attention to real issues. Make noise about things that matter.

  • F U N

    Jump

  • Are you sure it's not ukulele?

  • As a backend developer, where do I even start with frontend? Feeling major choice paralysis

    Jump

  • Are you building something for fun, or something meant to last? If you want it to last, I'd be looking at old frameworks - obviously React, and Vue has also been around a long time. Angular is also old, but Google maintains it, so they could kill it at any moment (and personally I hated it when I had to use it).

    I've never used Svelte, and don't know much about it. From a quick look online, primarily what it does differently than other frameworks is use a compiler. I'd be a little concerned here, because what it compiles to is JS, as that's what runs in your browser. This can make debugging more challenging, because when you pull up the debugger in the browser, it's not your code, it's the compiled code. They may have solved this problem, they may have browser extensions and IDE plugins to help with this, but find out before you start. If you can't use a debugger, use a different framework.

  • As a backend developer, where do I even start with frontend? Feeling major choice paralysis

    Jump

  • But you (almost certainly) started using those backend frameworks after you had experience. You learned the basics first, and then incorporated frameworks when you got to larger projects.

    I came here to say the same thing as the original reply in this thread, albeit with slightly different justification:

    If you don't know the basics, and can't build a functional site with just HTML/CSS/JavaScript, all of the frameworks will be a nightmare. You should really learn those first, even if it means building a practice site, or completely rebuilding your frontend when you decide to use a framework.

    The frameworks can make your life easier, but there's a learning curve, and a huge cognitive burden especially when you are just starting. You'll fight them more than work with them at the start.

    That all said, never use what's "hip" on the frontend. JS frameworks typically have the lifespan of a house fly. React is one of very, very few that has remained popular, and continued to get updates for a long time (at least in JS framework terms). It's a solid choice with a huge community, good docs, good tooling, etc. There may be other valid choices, but seriously - avoid anything new and flashy, because that usually just means its deficiencies haven't been found yet, and as soon as they are, there will be a new framework.

  • Boo

    Jump

  • But... you can see his face. He looks so happy! I'd sleep well with this guy watching over me.

  • "We need to go beyond Signal" – How today's AWS outage shows the weaknesses of centralized apps

    Jump

  • This article was posted here as well. Here's the comment I left there:

    This article seems either very naïve, or fairly disingenuous. Signal is not precariously installed on one box, and if that box goes down, the service dies. It is distributed. It's running on many machines within AWS, and technologically, there's no reason it couldn't be in multiple regions of AWS, or even spread across multiple clouds (e.g. Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle, etc), to improve resiliency to outages. The only way in which it is "centralized" is that there's one foundation in charge of the whole thing. Are there drawbacks to this? Yes. But self-hosted, distributed, mesh/relay chats also have drawbacks. Servers in the mesh go down, people don't keep things updated, they don't necessarily connect to every other instance creating disjointed pockets, etc.

    Also, to say "we don't need the internet" we need "mesh networks" is odd... The internet is a mesh. Hence "inter." Anything else is just a smaller version of the same thing, again with some benefits and some drawbacks.

    Fighting a (relatively) successful platform that champions privacy and security, seems like a bad thing to do, when those are the same primary goals of the platform you support. It would be better to discuss the merits and use cases of each, and beat the privacy and security drum together.

    In my opinion, this article is just spreading FUD. Signal is not perfect, but it's pretty good. And when there's an outage, we know why, and we know there's a team working on it. With a federatated service, it may be harder to take "the whole thing" down, but that doesn't mean nodes don't go down, service isn't disrupted, etc. Scaring people away from a (usually) reliable, open platform, that has been audited, that actively advances security research and keeps it's platform secure against emerging threats, is counter productive. It's just going to keep people using SMS and WhatsApp.

  • Deleted

    "We need to go beyond Signal" – How today's AWS outage shows the weaknesses of centralized apps

    Jump

  • Yeah, I noted that they are centrally run by a single foundation, and that there are drawbacks to that. My argument isn't that it is perfect, my argument is that it is good, and people promoting privacy and security shouldn't be cutting it down. The FUD just keeps people using SMS and WhatsApp.

  • Deleted

    "We need to go beyond Signal" – How today's AWS outage shows the weaknesses of centralized apps

    Jump

  • This article seems either very naïve, or fairly disingenuous. Signal is not precariously installed on one box, and if that box goes down, the service dies. It is distributed. It's running on many machines within AWS, and technologically, there's no reason it couldn't be in multiple regions of AWS, or even spread across multiple clouds (e.g. Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle, etc), to improve resiliency to outages. The only way in which it is "centralized" is that there's one foundation in charge of the whole thing. Are there drawbacks to this? Yes. But self-hosted, distributed, mesh/relay chats also have drawbacks. Servers in the mesh go down, people don't keep things updated, they don't necessarily connect to every other instance creating disjointed pockets, etc.

    Also, to say "we don't need the internet" we need "mesh networks" is odd... The internet is a mesh. Hence "inter." Anything else is just a smaller version of the same thing, again with some benefits and some drawbacks.

    Fighting a (relatively) successful platform that champions privacy and security, seems like a bad thing to do, when those are the same primary goals of the platform you support. It would be better to discuss the merits and use cases of each, and beat the privacy and security drum together.

  • Intent recognition for HomeAssistant without an LLM?

    Jump

  • I don't have as much experience with HASS, but I did use Mycroft for quite a while (stopped only because I had multiple big moves, and ended up in a place small enough voice control didn't really make sense any more). There were a few intent parsers used with/made for that:

    https://github.com/MycroftAI/adapt https://github.com/MycroftAI/padatious https://github.com/MycroftAI/padaos

    In my experience, Adapt was far and away the most reliable. If you go the route of rolling your own solution, I'd recommend checking that out, and using the absolute minimum number of words to design your intents. E.g. require "off" and an entity, and nothing else, so that "AC off," "turn off the AC," and "turn the AC off" all work. This reduces the number of words your STT has to transcribe correctly, and allows flexibility in command phrasing.

    If you borrow a little more from Mycroft, they had "fallback" skills that were triggered when an intent couldn't be matched. You could use the same idea, and use https://github.com/seatgeek/thefuzz to fuzzy match entities and keywords, to try to handle remaining cases where STT fails. I believe that is what this community made skill attempted to do: https://github.com/MycroftAI/skill-homeassistant (I think there were more than one HASS skill implementations, so I could be conflating this with another).

    Another comment mentioned OVOS/Neon - those forked off of Mycroft, so you may see overlap if you investigate those as well.

  • F-Droid and Google's Developer Registration Decree

    Jump

  • This is circular.

    if an attacker compromises the F-Droid app on your device, they can... load malicious apps onto your device

    Could be rewritten:

    if an attacker compromises your device, they can compromise your device

    You've already lost when they put the first malicious app on.

  • Unifying the Fediverse

    Jump

  • Fediverse... Fed... Federated. Unifying it would defeat the purpose. Yes, there could be a single platform, with federated hosting, but multiple platforms working with a single protocol is a good thing.

    Consider the web - in the old days, it was an open platform. Then Internet Explorer got a stranglehold, and to use the web practically required using IE on Windows (many sites did not work in other browsers). Eventually we righted the ship, but now Chromium browsers are taking over, and we're heading in a similar direction.

    For the fediverse to remain open and effective, we should embrace extra platforms*. It prevents anyone getting too much control over the protocol, prevents lock-in, prevents centralization, etc.

    *We should generally encourage use/development of the same protocol, though.

  • CPR

    Jump

  • Chest compressions, chest compressions, chest compressions.

  • [Video] TikTok grifter explains how influencers received new propaganda talking points from Netanyahu in their recent meeting.

    Jump
  • ChatGPT @lemmy.world
    JoeyJoeJoeJr @lemmy.ml

    ChatGPT voice mode with a toddler

  • Science @beehaw.org
    JoeyJoeJoeJr @lemmy.ml

    The Rare Disorder That Turns Everyone Else Into Demons

  • Android @lemmy.ml
    JoeyJoeJoeJr @lemmy.ml

    Does the Google Ecosystem Actually Work? Pixel Fold + Pixel Watch + Chromebook Plus

  • CSCareerQuestions @programming.dev
    JoeyJoeJoeJr @lemmy.ml

    Tips for getting contract work

  • Programming @programming.dev
    JoeyJoeJoeJr @lemmy.ml

    Tips for getting contract work

  • RISC-V @lemmy.ml
    JoeyJoeJoeJr @lemmy.ml

    First RISC-V mini laptops emerge

    www.notebookcheck.net /First-RISC-V-mini-laptops-emerge-Sipeed-Lichee-Console-4A-available-for-pre-order.783018.0.html
  • Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence @lemmy.world
    JoeyJoeJoeJr @lemmy.ml

    Excellent channel for learning to train and use computer vision models

    youtube.com /@ComputerVisionEngineer