As a hiring manager, I hear "my position is a one year contract" fairly regularly. It tells me a couple things:
This person is talent I wouldn't have access to if not for the expiring contract.
There's a solid chance that the current employer gets off their ass and makes a permanent offer when they realize I've made an offer.
Honestly, neither is a negative, to me.
Regarding 1, I do like when I get a shot at talent that wouldn't normally be on the market. I have a track record of successfully recruiting and retaining those folks.
Regarding 2, Knowing there's a chance their current employer will counter-offer is pretty normal for the talent I hire. I already account for that when making my job offers.
So overall, as others have said, I would just tell the truth about this. Everyone has a right to look out for their job security.
"and then we'll put oil and all kinds of weird stuff in all of the food, so then we can charge extra for anything that's just made with... Like...actual food. It'll be super profitable, guys."
"We have some exciting news to share: our talented developers gave Steam Deck players the option to play Assassin’s Creed Shadows at launch; despite initially announcing we wouldn’t be able to support until later,"
Edit: We just wanted to deny that we're not not going to do the thing at said we wouldn't not be able to do.
Whatever is happening, it's usually a safe bet the common person is better off when 'Virgin' doesn't get their way. Virgin has not established a reputation for being an ally to the common person.
I miss when we acknowledged that matters, instead of just throwing up our hands and saying "corporation are going to be evil".
Particulary relevant bit that made the rest of the topic more accessible, to me:
The researchers noted that a backlash against apps being marketed to catch cheating spouses, for example, has seen developers switch to marketing apps as parental control tools instead.
Ms Eva-Maria Maier, first author of the study from St. Pölten UAS, said: “The key issue with the extensive functionality of these unofficial apps is consent. If a parent has an open, transparent relationship with their child, they shouldn’t need to hide them on their child’s phone or have access to so much private information.
But research consistently shows that everyone is different and has different learning needs.
More ways to learn means more people succeed in learning.
Now your specific question is still quite interesting, with emphasis added to default:
Why it is not the default option for universities?
I think online is rapidly becoming the default for anything that can be learned online, for anyone who can learn online.
But I'm thankful that we have both community colleges and universities for things that cannot be effectively taught online and for people who needs more modes of learning.
has Elmo only hired people who claim that they can "wrangle data" and say "yes" ?
There's two issues going on:
Elmo's sociopathic approach to laying people off is public knowledge, and top experts have the luxury of not even applying for his jobs.
Elmo's ability to judge engineering talent has likely been wildly exaggerated thanks to how he has successfully bought organizations full of talented people, in the past.
ISBN Search is a non-monopolist source of the same information.