My neighbouring countries are all of Germanic descent, and I don't have that big of an issue with them, but certain other countries can fuck right off, IMO.
Also, this image contains a stupid, ignorant, argument, so no upvote from me.
The owner will use foreigners as scapegoats for the low salaries of the workers.
OK, but if you bring in a ton of foreigners to do a certain job, the salaries are going to be lower.
Not, that's not the foreigners fault, but the state's fault for letting those foreigners in, in the first place. Though I bet you have a strong opinion about mass-migration as well?
When you begin to study the tradition of your country, you often discover that many words, fairy tales, and dishes that you consider traditions of your own country are actually from very faraway places.
OK, and? That does not mean I can't love the way my country is, and that I want to protect this way. And it can be done without destroying someone else's country.
For example: the zero and chess from India; algebra and algorithms from Arabic countries; paper, silk, gunpowder, and ceramics from China; tomatoes and potatoes from America; etc.
Cool, and those countries use our inventions as well (telescopes, Stock Exchanges, pendulum clocks, polders (and water management in general)). That does not mean I stop wanting to preserve and protect the volksgeist of the country I live in.
No, that does not mean we don't do anything wrong, ever, and that we cannot grow beyond where we are now, but there are certain foundational aspects that I 100% want to see preserved (like showing up on an appointment, on time).
The origin of the word "nation" refers to the ethnicity (a folk, if you will) of the people that live in a land. No nation, no people. Example: The Roma, for example, are a nation without a country.
Now, to take pride in a thing means to regard it as good, worthy, admirable.
To take pride in one’s nation simply means to recognize the good, and to value, preserve, defend, and contribute to it. It means regarding one’s people, heritage, and public order as worthy of loyalty, care, and continuation. It does not require the claim that one’s nation is perfect, nor that it is superior to all others.
Nationalism becomes problematic as soon as loyalty to one’s own people or country becomes more important than truth, justice, and proportion. I think that there is where the issue truly lies.
TL;DR: There is nothing wrong in recognizing the good your nation does, and recognize that another nation may be incompatible with yours in certain parts is OK. "Abusus non tollit usum" - Cicero (I think?): "abuse does not cancel use", or "misuse of something is no argument against its proper use".
I mean, the Suffragettes (proto-feminists) already firebombed some places, like a bunch of terrorists, so it's not like Feminism already had a good name.
In case you think only feminists fought for suffrage: There already was a larger, unnamed, suffrage movement that fought, without violence, for universal suffrage.
Important Notice: Feminism does not have a monopoly on universal suffrage.
If those families are not my friends, why should I care? I had the foresight to see the bread shortage coming, I paid for the bread with my own money. I don't see why I should give away the things I've spent time and energy on. Not my issue they are dumb.
Ah shit, you must be from the based timeline. I got the one with 9/11 and COVID instead :/