GitHub Platform availability dips to 87.25%, averages 1.04 incidents/day
GitHub Platform availability dips to 87.25%, averages 1.04 incidents/day
GitHub Platform availability dips to 87.25%, averages 1.04 incidents/day
A Cryptography Engineer’s Perspective on Quantum Computing Timelines
Activating Two Trap Cards at Once, or: A Gentle Response to the Popularity of Vibecoding
Vibecoding Challenge 2: The Five Feathers (Spring 2026)
Palantir Sues Swiss Magazine For Accurately Reporting That The Swiss Government Didn’t Want Palantir
Lobsters Vibecoding Challenge (Winter 2025-2026)
A Nix flake for detecting and removing fascist software
CATGIRL Officially Banned For Cheating!!!
Your favorite science YouTubers are misleading you about AI — how to spot lies
Ai told me to kіӏӏ 17 people (and myself)!
Anil Seth: Can AI Be Conscious?
The Biggest, Craziest Wikipedia Drama Ever
ChatGPT made me delusional
Are You Under the Influence? The Tail That Wags The Dog - Dhole Moments
Busy Beaver Gauge
Bag of words, have mercy on us
OpenAI investor falls for GPT's SCP-style babble
A non-anthropomorphized view of LLMs
Linux users failing to respect trans Linux developers
Leopard-trainer J. Tunney now scared of leopards
Thanks for posting this; if you hadn't, I would have. Piper really doesn't seem to understand that bubbles form and pop over a span of three to five years. Like, I'm not sure how much charity I'm supposed to give to analyses like:
Pets.com!? Kelsey, even reading a basic article about the dot-com bubble would have saved you embarrassment here. Zitron's analogy is excellent because the bubble is multifactorial and the analogies that we can make are factor-to-factor. Here's some things that caused the dot-com bubble; people were overly optimistic about:
Compared to all of that, Kelsey, Pets.com was just an Amazon.com experiment. Remember Amazon.com? Did the dot-com bubble kill them? No? Anyway, Pets.com is kind of like the small labs that hover around OpenAI and Anthropic, trying out various little harnesses and adapters on top of their token APIs. Pets.com is like OpenClaw; it's not that important of a player in the overall finances, just an example of how severely the big labs are distorting incentives for small labs.
The uselessness of the products in 2023 directly led to the bad investments in 2024 and the Enron-esque financial deals in 2025, Kelsey. The future is conditioned upon the past, y'know?