Right? Like isn't this just a different algorithm at the end of the day? This just has an organic (as in a part of the design) way to skip parts of the equation with pressumed constants.
Funding should follow needs and accountable wants not ideals. What do you want and is the ESA the best org to do that?
The exception is infrasture and administrative tooling. Invest the hell out of that almost always.
If an org should exist it should exist in the most efficient and effective way possible
Any person moving away from supporting authoritarian and war crimes has my support. Abusers would love their victims to feel the world is against them too
Honestly. I agree. A big issue the US has with "industrial policy" type of deals in general is this. Big businesses can afford to have specialists to get access to programs and programs can "accomplish" their budgets goals faster with these bigger deals. The COVID small business loans had the same issue.
Also supply side money funnels are popular with donors/lobbyists (for obvious reasons) but are almost always garbage. Demand side (upfront funding for some needed thing, and payments for fulfillment) are still possible for to fuck up but do WAY better.
Both competing hard on who will develop the best mass survelince and censorship systems. I hope the people working to actually better the world get more funding soon
Libertarians that voted for him really bit the fucking onion, huh?
Like the rest of the facism should been enough but him supporting crypto just enough to innovate new fraud for himself is so on brand he should file a fucking patent
Right? Like isn't this just a different algorithm at the end of the day? This just has an organic (as in a part of the design) way to skip parts of the equation with pressumed constants.