Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
1
Comments
180
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • YSK: thisismyip.com (website to display your IP) had inserted new code to its website that is detected by Kaspersky antivirus and Fortinet as malicious; Here are some alternatives to use instead

    Jump
  • Is it malicious code hosted on the website? Or are they saying that visiting that site is an indicator of compromise because they've malware commonly visiting that site?

  • I was just introduced to NetBox and it's really intriguing. It does look complicated but once it is setup it seems to work very well at integrating data from a spreadsheet into it and then automatically documenting changes and such. It's open source as well.

    https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox

  • I often print 3 walls and 10% infill and the prints are plenty strong. These are not high stress objects, but they can take plenty of stress without breaking.

    I did print some curtain rod holders for some outdoor curtains. They had 3 walls and I think 25% infill. They do get a lot stress from the wind blowing, but they have held up very well in the 3 months they have been up.

  • Agreed. If I am making it building something then I prefer metric. If I am thinking about how tall something is or how long it is I think in standard. I just feel that one foot is a good size to measure something rather than meters or centimeters. It's much easier for me to imagine a 6 foot tall object than a 1.83 meters or 183 centimeters. It's just easier to break something up into 6 parts than it is to break something into 1.83 parts or 183 parts.

    I know you could use a unit that equals 25 centimeters and that would be similar to a foot, but no one uses that for some reason.

  • I think "dumb/lazy" isn't the correct terminology to describe them. I think the more correct term would be ambiguous. It seems to me that most people aren't as concerned about the true meaning of a word, they're more concerned with the big picture. So to them using a word that isn't exactly correct is not a big deal as long as they can get the big picture across.

    I think for them it is more about efficiency than it is about choosing the correct words.

  • Adam Savage makes several videos about props being put up for auction. He even did a video on this rhino.

  • As employers we are not allowed to pry into personal health issues.

  • Yeah wkrn bent the knee a long time ago.

  • Damn Blackhawks fan...

  • Pro-tip: To see this for the Southern hemisphere just download the picture, open it, and click Rotate 90° twice.

  • I tried following this and it didn't work. Searched "no image produced" and got no results.

    Searched "no image" and got results, but they are all pdf files that I can view.

  • I will NOT let that sink in.

    I have no idea what that thing has gotten into.

  • Oh ok, thanks for the explanation. I did not associate the other random people as being telepathic and in the club.

    I would have had all the telepathic people doing something like, have their hand on their chins as if they were thinking. That would be a visual trigger that allows me to link all of the characters together.

    Obviously some people got it without an explanation, so perhaps it's just me who has an issue understanding this. 🙂

  • The swift swift swiftly swifted in the swiftest way possible.

  • If you have curly hair you would be best served finding a stylist who knows how to properly cut curly hair.

  • What the L-R-D's?

  • You don't have gutters?

  • Let me guess, he is bowing towards the south

  • You should look into restaurant health codes regarding washing dishes.

  • Thunder App @lemmy.world

    How do I view posts and comments that I have saved?