That's what I mean. Even with guardrails, people. Will find a way around it. Fine the companies and they will find a solution. Make the economic consequences a reason to. And don't allow them to shift reaponsibility, is the main part.
I'm fine with allowing it with specific consent of the parties involved. And no option to shift the responsibility onto the user. So fine the company for every time there isn't. Doubly so if it's use becomes abusive. Jail if it's children.
Yes, it's great. One of things I think that is being skipped over in the ai discussion is that the errors and volume of slop make productivity harder for the people working with people using it.
I have a small business. I get a job application or a report or a draft of an important email and it takes more time to process and check it as its undoubtedly ai genersted.
So for those using ai, it's junk, but also those working with those using ai (which may be elsewhere and not in house), it's adding to workload. I think I saw someone discussing how ai is outsourcing cognitivr load to the ai, but also to those that use the output of ai, rather than historically, those who produced the content.
Really interesting, and depressing. They touched on it with this discussion where they talked about how capital wants to produce volume whereby labour wants to produce quality.
Yes, and if you're able to work and only have months to live, that's the best use of your time. For the benefit of society, of course. But also to keep your dignity and not be a freeloader. Without those 200 or so extra hours of work, the share market might dip. Or worse, you might get to spend some time with friends or family. Or going to medical appointments.
Not as advertised. But as per the t&cs. Many countries have truth in advertising lately s that the t&cs cannot override, but only clarify so if it's outright misleading, the t&cs don't matter.
Is this a way to recognise asian pop music or a way to sideline it? Does the answer change depending on the existing success of the band or singer?
By that, I mean, is this a good way to exclude bands like BTS or blackpinknwith already global fanbases, but good for up and coming bands that have not broken globally yet?
Someone who is not into Kpop is not going to check out this category. So excluding them from general pop, but allowing song or record of the year seems like a bigger hurdle to get recognition.
I think that’s part of the plan and risk of AI. They will try and rent cpu usage and knowledge. Hopefully, they don’t succeed and instead we have open source AI and less dependence on tech. Even without a crash.
As much as demand for ram and video cards is killing everyone currently, there should be an increase in supply if it’s prolonged enough. Even without a crash.
Now, add a crash and we may have better home ram and video cards for cheap. I think given American volatility, and tech enshittification, people no longer trust the cloud and are moving away from it. They are also sick of subscriptions.
It doesn’t. It just says not to do so for trans appearing people. I’m pointing out the unspoken hypocrisy. This entire article is a response to a museum labelling someone as trans,
Yes, but its advocating to not point out any trans or bisexual or gay correlation, while neglecting to do the same for any assumed cis or heterosexual correlation.
When a museum talks about Caeser marrying Calpurnia, there is no article saying, well the marriage was different by todays standards and he was also likely fucking slaves, women, boys and other men. However, when someone is documented (possibly intended as a slur , as the article says) as having trans characteristics, then we should be wary of applying modern labels?
I think saying drawn to hardship has an unintended implication that they choose to be trans. And therefore choose hardship. That's who they are, not what they choose. That's why it bristled for me.
People with their own community websites did this before reddit existed. Then yelp and google did it whole-scale. Then they enshittified it when those websites were gone/didn't rank.
Nokia 3210?