I skimmed the article, but didn't see any proof that there was a decision made at Mozilla due to her prior activism. Was this just a frivolous lawsuit or am I missing something?
I've got multiple adguard/unbound instances running locally. Confused as to why you don't like unbound. Its robust and fairly straight forward to setup IMO. Only time I've ever had issues with it was when I was trying to set up DoT, but that was most likely an issue on my side. Oh there was a brief stint of some DNSSEC issues, so I opted for a less strict config. A lot of this is easily found online or via chatting with a friendly neighborhood LLM
I now just have it setup to recursively resolve, and its been running without any issue for over a year now
Get a KVM that gives you remote access if you're really worried but your server really should stay up without issue unless you have some faulty hardware or setup
I've been using mullvad's browser on my laptop. It's basically tor without the network, and has the lowest bits of identifying information exposed via the EFF test I could find. Havent tried this out though
Sure but a 68.4 million tax break is nothing compared to the hundreds of billions pledged privately