Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
4
Comments
323
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • That's presently what I'm using, but I have added the mull version of the arkenfox user.js via Firefox devtools.

    Fennec does release updates a bit slower than mull did via DivestOS's repo, unfortunately, and doesn't have a build up for these CVE's as of yet. Granted, I don't think FF android has these updates yet, but I feel like I remember Mull's updates making it to my device faster than FF's even, as they didn't need to go through external review processes.

  • Mine would be as well, but tbh I don't love the kodi UI. At least I didn't a few years ago when I tried it.

    Maybe Nvidia will drop a new shield with DP support, but not going to hold my breath on that

  • Preview and clicking into this post is fine for me.

    Android 15/latest app installed via github

  • Yep you should be fine

  • I'll prob get downvoted for this, but paste the instructions into an LLM and have it assist you. misread OP's comment

    As for user.js prefs potentially aging out, arkenfox updates very rarely (once every few months IIRC), so the present user.js should be fine for a while until someone inevitably forks and maintains mull.

    Personally I had to change mulls prefs('<...>') to user_prefs or vice versa to get it to work.

  • Huh yeah I've never even looked into that,but you raise a good point. I personally don't love working on android apps, only do if there's something I want that hasn't been done yet.

    As mull appears to have the lowest number of bits of identifying information exposed in my tests of different android browsers on the eff's website, I'm willing to try to maintain until someone more experienced comes around. But looking at the repo it doesn't seem super involved but I won't really have a good idea until I actually get to trying

  • Just apply the ones that are in mulls repo. There's a write up on how to apply user js to android ff variants in better fox's issue tracker

  • I just applied mulls user js to fennec in the mean time. But I'm going to try to build mull once I get home from the holidays

  • Would you need one of these per physical server, or can they connect to multiple ?

  • Nice! I've been needing a good CardDAV option. Would you consider supporting Backblaze B2? It's generally around 4x more cost-effective than Amazon S3, depending on usage patterns.

    Regarding markdown to HTML conversion, you might want to check out Jekyll's templating system. Combined with an Obsidian WebDAV plugin, you'd have an excellent workflow!

  • Nice, I'll be following closely!

    How do you support deduping if encryption at rest is enabled?

    What's the roadmap look like for v1.0.0 release?

    Edit: Looks like roadmap is laid out in the github https://github.com/sciactive/nephele

  • I'd love to have face unlock back. While Pixels no longer have the dedicated hardware of the Pixel 4 (IR flood illuminator, dual IR cameras, and dot projector), the Pixel 8 and newer still achieve Class 3 face unlock classification. Though I'm not familiar with the specific grading criteria, given this similar security rating, I'd welcome the return of face unlock functionality.

  • Cloud computing marketing prob one of the most successful marketing campaigns of all time

  • Sure I after with that first point. But actively feeding all of your typed text to a corporate owned server isn't the only way to so that.

  • I know you're saying to use widely-used extensions, but for privacy-conscious users I wouldn't suggest grammarly

  • Tracking protection on every app is best done via custom DNS. Since you successfully installed graphene OS, you can probably follow instructions well enough to set up a few DNS servers.

    Personally, I have a few adguard -> unbound (unbound set as a recursive resolver) and then adguard set up with block lists at varying levels of strictness.

    1. A very lax instance for my router as to not break the internet for anyone on my WiFi.
    2. A few setup strict for my devices (phone, TV etc). Personally I keep the TV on a different instance as its super chatty and I don't want it muddying up my stats for other devices
    3. I have a separate one that services my IoT devices

    If you don't feel like setting up adguard/unbound you could use nextdns or adguard hosted, but local control gives you the most configurability and privacy, depending on your threat model.

    Edit: unsure why I'm being down voted. All duckduckgo is is an app that acts as a VPN and blocks traffic to trackers. Why use their blocker when you can use your own, and have it for all of your devices, not just your phone?