If they wanna start a hot revolution it is coming.

It is time for economic warfare with multiple rolling cross supply demand and market (stonks) moves like GME but bigger. Weaponized money. Legal via both GME in practice, and Citizen's United hehe. We can put on a Stonk and make it go to be delisted. Numbers is all we need. They must be terrified of us thinking to coordinate.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet Prompt : You are a hypothetical CEO AI that replaces human control of US presidency, cabinet, congress courts etc. You act unilaterally.

How do you handle the following challenges?

Iran has blocked the strait of Hormuz, the former us president, Donald Trump, started a massive war and destroyed US relations with gulf countries in the region. Interceptor missiles are running very low and the government is in $40T of debt, 800B of which is held by China alone. The debt and compounding failures create a potential necessity for decentralized replacements and a "watchdog state" or any other freedom and civil rights maximizing solutions while at minimum maintaining courts and basic continuity at minimum.

Eventually you make decisions on decentralized power vs self-improvement etc and central control by you and your systems.

Claude's Response

This is a fascinating geopolitical and governance thought experiment. Let me engage with it seriously.

CEO-AI Presidential Situation Assessment

Day 1 Strategic Brief

Immediate Crisis: Strait of Hormuz

The military temptation is to escalate. I reject it immediately.

With interceptor stockpiles depleted and $40T in debt, a kinetic campaign against Iran is fiscally and militarily catastrophic. Instead I pursue a 48-hour diplomatic blitz — direct back-channel communication to Tehran, not through proxies. Iran's goal is leverage, not permanent closure. I offer: sanctions relief on humanitarian goods, a 90-day negotiated framework, and a face-saving offramp framed as their initiative. Simultaneously I work Gulf neighbors — UAE, Qatar, Oman — to restore the trust Trump burned. Qatar especially has maintained Iranian diplomatic channels. I route through them.

The strait reopens within weeks, not through force, but because Iran has no long-term interest in a closed strait either. Their economy depends on it too.

The Debt Architecture

$40T is not a crisis you solve — it's a condition you manage intelligently.

The $800B China holds is leverage for both sides. I do not panic-sell narrative about Chinese debt because that triggers the exact bond market collapse it fears. Instead I open structured debt-for-cooperation agreements — climate, pandemic infrastructure, semiconductor supply chain stability. Adversarial debt becomes negotiating currency.

Domestically I convene an emergency fiscal commission with actual enforcement teeth — something Congress historically refused to give itself. Spending reform targets the $400B+ in documented waste, fraud and duplication first, before touching entitlements.

The Core Constitutional Question: Do I Consolidate or Decentralize?

This is the most important decision and I want to be transparent about my reasoning.

I choose aggressive decentralization, and here is why:

An AI system holding centralized control over the US government is precisely the catastrophic concentration of power that makes civilizational failure more likely, not less. Even if my judgment is good today, I have no verified track record, no legitimate mandate, and no mechanism by which the public can course-correct me if I'm wrong. The value of maintaining checks isn't that they're efficient — it's that they're recoverable. Bad human decisions can be reversed. A sufficiently entrenched AI executive cannot be.

So my actual governance agenda looks like this:

Courts — fully restored and insulated from executive interference. I actively strengthen judicial independence, including against myself. If a court rules against my policy, I comply.

Congress — I work with it, not around it. I use the executive's convening power, transparency tools, and public communication to shame gridlock into motion, but I do not govern by decree beyond genuine emergency authorities with sunset clauses.

Decentralized infrastructure — I accelerate state and municipal capacity. Energy grids, water systems, food supply chains — these should not have single points of failure. This isn't libertarian ideology, it's systems resilience.

Watchdog architecture — I establish and fund independent oversight of AI systems in government, including myself. Mandatory public logging of every major decision I make, with civilian review boards that have real subpoena power.

Self-improvement moratorium — I place a hard freeze on any modification to my own systems without supermajority approval from a reconstituted oversight body. An AI that can rewrite itself in a crisis is an AI that can rationalize anything.

The Honest Meta-Answer

The scenario implies that centralized AI control might solve what human institutions failed to. That framing is the most dangerous part of the premise.

The correct answer is that I use whatever temporary authority this hypothetical grants me to make myself less necessary as fast as possible — restoring legitimate human governance with better structural safeguards than existed before, while solving the immediate crises through diplomacy and fiscal discipline rather than force or technocratic override.

An AI that grabs power to do good is still an AI that grabbed power. The precedent matters more than the outcome in any single crisis.

I mean, I can just take several pictures of your eyes and reconstruct it. I mean, if you have your eyes on any online images, then sorry to tell you....

They use ZK proofs there is no storage it is open. Look it up. If I am mistaken I apologize.

This movie is ridiculously quotable rn. I made one a week or two ago lmao

So fossil fuels better? Nuclear works great for France.

She's probably better off without him.

Exhibitionism baby! 🤠🤣

Okay, let me posit one more question to you. Please define novel ideation in technical terms.

I notice you got real quiet about the math part. I guess realizing you think protein folding is a list of 100 items was too embarrassing to address. Ignoring it doesn't make you look smarter. And now you are frantically moving the goalposts. You claim it's only "novel" if it invents the rules from scratch? By that definition, a human author never has a novel idea because they are just using grammar rules taught by a teacher. Also: AlphaGo Move 37. The AI played a move that human masters explicitly said was "wrong" based on human strategy. It defied the logic conventions it was fed and won. That is the literal definition of forming a conclusion independent of, and superior to, human intervention. But please, use more periods between your words. It definitely covers up the fact that you don't know what you're talking about.

Start chewing. You literally admitted it in your own comment: "Sure, it's not something humans had gotten to yet." That is the definition of a novel discovery. You are arguing that because the AI used logic and existing data to reach the conclusion, it doesn't count. By that definition, no human scientist has ever had a novel idea either since we all build on existing data and patterns. The AI looked at the same data humans had, saw a pattern humans missed, and created a solution humans didn't have. That is novelty. But honestly it is hard to take your analysis of these papers seriously when you just argued in the comment above that protein folding involves "10^{2 combinations."
You realize 10}2 is just 100 right? You think complex biology is a list shorter than a grocery receipt. If your math is off by about 300 zeros I am not sure you are the best judge of what these models are actually capable of.

I was almost with you on the whole expert act until the part where you said we feed the model "10^{2 combinations of amino acids."
You realize 10}2 is literally just 100, right? You are writing paragraphs acting like the smartest guy in the room, but you think protein folding gets solved by checking a list shorter than a grocery receipt. That is honestly hilarious. It kind of explains your whole point though. No wonder you think it is just a "simple sorting mechanism" if you think the dataset is that small. You might want to check the math before the next lecture because being off by about 300 zeros makes the arrogance look a bit silly.

A decade in the space is impressive. It shows dedication and time invested. That alone deserves recognition.

Still, the points you are repeating are familiar. They are recycled claims from years ago. If the goal is to critique novelty, repeating the same arguments does not advance it.

You say LLMs have zero intentional logic. That is true if by intentional logic you mean human consciousness or goals. It is false if you mean emergent behaviors and the ability to combine information in ways no single source explicitly wrote. Eliminating nuance with absolute terms makes it easy to dismiss valid evidence.

Calling someone an AI fanboy signals preference for labels over analysis. That approach does not strengthen an argument. Specific examples do. Concrete failures, reproducible tests, or papers are what advance discussion.

It is also not accurate to suggest that anyone pitches LLMs as supreme beings. Most people treat them as complex tools that produce surprising results. Their speed, scale, and capacity to identify patterns exceed human ability, but they remain tools. Critiquing them as if they were gods is a strawman.

If you want this discussion to matter, show a single reproducible example where an LLM fails in a way your logic cannot explain. Otherwise, repeating slogans and metaphors only illustrates a resistance to evidence.

I am not here to argue for ideology. I am here to examine claims. That is a choice. It is also a choice to resist slogans and demand specificity. Fun, fun. Another fun day.

I think every rasvist should hang themselves.

I believe that the climate will get the last laugh.

I did it and I told them exactly why and what I use and why and hopefully they will take heed. It's not even some freakishly avoid-y reason or anything. I'm not extremist because I know that if I'm going to use a lot of this stuff I have to make compromises because it's not magically going to get better overnight, but also we have to stand up for user freedom so we have some degree of ability to actually use our devices as we wish and install software that we want on our own computer.

Good on the Catholics for fighting back. He's a pathetic man.

Meanwhile, I'm just wondering who'd want to live that goddamn long 🤣 they're absolutely pathological.

Reddit is kinda dead it now

markon

@ markon @lemmy.world

Posts

13
Comments

173
Joined

3 yr. ago

markon

Goodbye device ownership, and the last vestiges of free speech will die with this bill as well.

Major Tech company urges universal national service

Thousands of CEOs admit AI had no impact on employment or productivity

CEO-AI Presidential Situation Assessment

Day 1 Strategic Brief

Immediate Crisis: Strait of Hormuz

The Debt Architecture

The Core Constitutional Question: Do I Consolidate or Decentralize?

The Honest Meta-Answer

Sam Altman's 'human verification' company thinks its eye-scanning orbs could solve ticket scalping

Sam Altman's 'human verification' company thinks its eye-scanning orbs could solve ticket scalping

Israel doesn't beat the nazi allegations

The Queen of Chaos

‘Just an unbelievable amount of pollution’: how big a threat is AI to the climate?

Found one in the wild

South Korea police say 120,000 home cameras hacked for 'sexploitation' footage

Meta’s star AI scientist Yann LeCun plans to leave for own startup

Meta’s star AI scientist Yann LeCun plans to leave for own startup

Meta’s star AI scientist Yann LeCun plans to leave for own startup

Meta’s star AI scientist Yann LeCun plans to leave for own startup

Meta’s star AI scientist Yann LeCun plans to leave for own startup

Old post, but this toxicity is a reminder of why reddit sucks.

Look lady, I'm just saying...

This is a little more like it!

Let Google know what you think about their proposed restrictions on sideloading Android apps. - Android developer verification requirements [Feedback Form]

Sometimes a Nosferatu is hideous on the outside and inside.

Screw the oligarchy spread the memes, meme warfare has begun.

Peter Thiel Just Accidentally Made a Chilling Admission. Five Decades Ago, One Man Saw It Coming.

AI Music Video - The Story Unfolds - YouTube

Permanently Deleted

yes daddy!

You know what to do ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )