Shotguns with 1oz slugs transfer enough force that even if they hit armor capable of stopping it, it can cave in a chest cavity and leave someone slowly suffocating.
Edit: oops, ment to post this in the othet thread about firearms I was talking in and not here. Oh well I'll leave it since there's no true delete in the fediverse.
They've done research that shows NT peers can tell something is different about you withing the first minutes of meeting you. Even if you don't speak and just listen. They may not know its autism right away but they know they're not like us, and NTs are judgey AF.
Everyone's always over reacting until the next one effects you. The article also said in addition to test scores it had little if any impact on bullying and attendance, not just test scores.
Not shocked at the findings, nor at governments deciding that their decisions to take rights away matters more than what the science says. If you let them set that pecedent, don't cry when the next rights they take are ones you were enjoying.
Because its still a rifle round, but the features being banned make no difference in the lethality of the bullet. The article you linked compared the AR to only handguns but no other rifles. Any semi auto 5.56 is as deadly as an AR (if it's chambered in the same caliber) weather it has the banned features or not.
Not true, a bolt action chambered in the same caliber with the same barrel length will be exactly the same muzzle velocity. Muzzle energy is also a more telling stat than velocity. In terms of muzzle energy 5.56 is just an intermediate cartridge, in fact in some states it's actually illegal to hunt deer or larger game with 5.56 because without good shot placement it doesn't kill them humanely enough. Often times bolt actions are also chambered in larger calibers like .308 which are better for large game and also penetrates body armor until you get to the really high-level armor plates. Nothing about the features being banned determines muzzle velocity or energy.
Nothing. Assault style is nebulous and changes by state. Pistol grip on a rifle is the most common defining to-be banned feature I'd wager. Some bans also target stocks with multiple lengths, threaded barrels, or even 'barrel shrouds' sometimes defined as almost anything touching the barrel of the rifle that allows you to hold it by circumventing the heat of the barrel. Tldr mostly they're banning ergonomics.
In the Onions plea to not stall the turnover they cited how Jones continued to pedel the very same narrative that was ruled criminal from the platform the court refused to hand over in proper time. If any kind of domestic terrorism comes from this the fault lies squarely on the US Criminal Punishment system.
Nice I get to break out the classics