Are they claiming that the event has given the property a bad reputation that reduces its value by that amount? I suppose those are plausible grounds for a lawsuit. I can't think of any other way a death on the property several years ago could cause damage to the new owners. Surely they're not claiming that the house is haunted (and if that's the issue, I can imagine the judge being extremely unamused).
- Posts
- 4
- Comments
- 1959
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 4
- Comments
- 1959
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
My suspicion is that they didn't talk to the neighbours until after they bought the house. So, yeah, lack of due diligence.