I feel like you’re twisting my meaning to incite an argument I’m not trying to have or back.
Sometimes coups are good, sometimes bad. End of thought.
The end result of the coup in Haiti was “it was bad”. End of thought.
If you think the USA was behind the coup, the coup that turned out to be bad, then you probably think the Clintons returning him to power was also bad. End of thought.
I’m saying I don’t think I am both informed enough OR involved enough to have a really good take on the events.
I was replying to you.
Sometimes coups are good, sometimes they are bad, the end result of the coup was bad and if you take any stock in the US being behind it then the Clinton’s putting him back is bad.
That’s the answer to the question you asked, I’m not trying to take a side here specifically in these comments even if I’d be apt to believe that it was well intentioned.
Yeah but it’s got thick cut gabagool in it