I think anyone at the point of learning those subjects would just call them by their name. From my experience, "advanced calculus" usually refers to introduction to real analisys courses like Spivak or even Baby Rudin. It seems nowadays it's being used to refer to multivariate and DEs, which I guess makes a little more sense but it still bothers me.
Nothing. It's a meaningless term. Some people use it to say "hard calculus" (multivariate, pdes, etc) and I suspect that's how it's being used here but, historically, it has mostly been used to refer to the introduction to real analysis courses found in books like Spivak and Apostol.
I'm officially triggered. There's no such thing as "advanced calculus". Yes, I'm aware of Loomis and Sternberg. That book was literally written to stroke the authors' ego.
No, it's because humans are inherently selfish and stupid beings that will always endanger others to avoid inconvenience and an "ebike" like the one in the picture is just a motorcycle with a licence to ignore traffic laws.
Do you even realize how hilariously pathetic you're being right now? You legitimately, unironically and with a straight face just said "go back to reddit". Jesuschrist, you're such a baby.
Not quite. Mathematicians realised that "counting" is just defining relations between sets of things and sets of the form {1,2,3,...}, in such a way that every thing gets assigned 1 and only 1 number.
Usually, the relation is defined by pointing to each of the things we want to count and saying the number we're assigning to it. However, using this whimsical definition of counting allows us to define the relation in equally whimsical ways and "count" stuff we normally wouldn't be able to, however impractical (or even infinite). For example, we know we can "count" the natural numbers, even though they're infinite, because we obviously can assign a number to each one of them, namely themselves. But did you know we can also "count" the rational numbers? The thing about the reals, though, is that not only we haven't been able to find this relation, but we actually proved that it's impossible to find. The proof isn't actually hard to follow so I recommend you check it out.
As if the guys who make these kind of comments wouldn't instantly fall head over heels for literally any woman who looks in their general direction without complete disgust.
I have a change jar that I put my coins in and, unless I decided on something completely stupid that'll cost me >$1000, it usually has enough for a nice tattoo by the end of the year.
You're forgetting OP of the greentext is a 4chan regular so their social circle is probably entirely comprised of vocal assholes of reddit and x flinging shit at each other.
It's great for throwaway factoids that you're curious about in the moment but won't remember or care about an hour later
Not even the greatest Sci-Fi writers of, this, and all future times could ever hope to conceive an idea of an intelligence, not of human origin, that would be able to answer such riveting questions as "what's the name of that guy in that movie?". Cutie, eat your positronic heart out.
Joke's on you. I've been complaining about her acting since I found out everyone who played an amazon had to fake an Israeli accent because Gal Gadot, a professional actress who gets literally hundreds of thousands of dollars per movie, couldn't hide her own.
wins a Nobel