Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
5
Comments
2037
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The most important question to ask when evaluating end-to-end encryption: who manages the keys?

    If Facebook manages all of the keys and is responsible for telling which public key belongs to who, then of course Facebook can read every message.

  • Creating a hiking trail alters the surrounding environment no matter what you do

    Yes, but this is done in a managed way to allow us to enjoy the outdoors responsibly.

    Walking off that built path is also destructive more or less.

    Yes, which is why it is discourteous and you should not do it.

    How many parking lots were created at trail heads?

    Again, done in a managed way to allow us to enjoy the outdoors. Also the parking lot and trailhead are generally not deep in pristine nature and instead already on the side of a roadway.

    Is there an easy way for people to get there without using a vehicle?

    Why, though?

    The entire 'outdoor activity' industry almost seems like a way for people to cop out from responsibility for climate change.

    This is really bizarre logic. It sounds like you need to get outside and touch some grass.

    Many people will say it's important to get into nature every once in awhile, but what does that really cost?

    Hiking is probably one of the lowest impact activities one can do. On the list of priorities to conserve nature, this is one of the lowest and something that does not need to change much, if at all, as long as people follow conventions like staying on the managed paths and don't litter.

    Every step you leave behind bits of synthetic material that will persist for thousands of years

    Scale is important here, and you're talking about things like micrograms. Plastic does not persist in the environment for thousands of years, in the first place, and micrograms of it would for much much less time than other plastic waste. Plastic is not a magically indestructible material, and it does break down into organic compounds with sunlight, changes in temperature, chemical processes etc. The real issue with plastic waste is the fact that we are producing more and more of it each year at a rate that outpaces it breaking down, and do not really have a viable way to deal with the waste at the same scale as our production.

    Well, on the bright side there isn't much nature left anyway.

    This is false in multiple ways. 1, there are huge amounts of natural land. 2, the amount of natural forest globally has only increased since the early 1980s, and the same is true for land set aside for natural conservation and preservation. There's literally more natural space right now than there has been in the last 40 years.

    If you believed that there isn't much nature left, it's a big sign that you're consuming too much doom content from the internet and have created a false and skewed perspective.

  • Annnnnnnnnd another reply has pointed out the fact that this post is satire and not actually a real thing.

  • Corporations overmarketed a product?? Wow, no way! Must be the first time ever.

  • The system prompt is configuration, and configuration is input. Semantics don't actually challenge my point.

  • Not to defend AI, but this is really foolish thinking. Configuration to make it useful proves it is not useful?

  • Quote me in full.

    Okay!

    You can run at scale, on huawei. You can also run it on a cpu

    Yeah, that is absolutely not what you argued.

    Anyway, you've conceded that I'm correct that you cannot run it at scale on a CPU, because running on CPU is too slow and inefficient, and that they instead use GPU hardware like Huawei GPUs to run the model at scale. That's good enough for me!

  • Yes, you can run it at scale.

    at scale

    Shift those goalposts! We went from "at scale" to "it still runs"

  • You've proved my point that you don't know what you're talking about by blindly linking to the git repo. Couldn't find any source that supports your claim? I wonder why.

    Sure you can serve one request at a time to one patient user at a slow token per second rate, which makes running locally viable, but there is no RAM that has the bandwidth to run this model at scale. Even flash would be incredibly slow on CPU with multiple requests. You'd need the high bandwidth of VRAM and to run across multiple GPUs in a scalable way, it requires extremely high bandwidth interconnects between GPUs.

  • Nope! You don't know what you're talking about. At all. But you can have fun running a 1.6 trillion parameter model on CPU at basically 0 tokens per second at scale, MoE or not.

  • I mean, sure. You could also run it by drawing marks in sand. It doesn't make any sense to do either, though.

  • NPM yet again because it was one of the examples I used that you failed to address

    I clearly acknowleged that both package managers and the windows method are vulnerable to supply chain attacks.

    I'm pretty sure I noted your demonstated lack of reading comprehension, not ignorance. Doesn't seem to have improved in the last 2 weeks.

    Hopefully manufacturing irrelevant scenarios works out for you in your career.

    That's ironic.

  • I also never used insults... maybe you're recalling the posts where you called me a "clown" and "fuckwit"?

    I only stated that there are more security problems for the average user related to: doing a web search, clicking the first link, and executing a basically random binary downloaded from some website, ie the standard way of downloading software on windows; than there is to using a package manager.

    I clearly acknowleged that both package managers and the windows method are vulnerable to supply chain attacks.

    You just wanted to create an argument, and it's genuinely hilarious that it's still in your mind. I had forgotten you existed 😂

    Going by your logic

    You do quite a lot of talking for me and telling me what my position/logic is. It's almost like you're arguing with yourself rather than any of the points I've stated. Well, enjoy arguing with yourself still, somehow.

  • Huh? I have never claimed they are?

    In cybersecurity, perfect is not a thing. You can only mitigate risks within a threat model.

  • Most all of the reporting about this is purely misinformation. If you actually read the papers that Anthropic published instead of the marketing material, you'll find that:

    • it was actually claude opus that discovered many of the vulnerabilities, not mythos, which undermines the "MyThOs Is ToO dAnGeRoUs" narrative. All of these capabilities are already out there for anyone to use
    • the researchers guided mythos to the vulnerabilities, not the other way around
  • Lying for the investigation is a federal crime

  • The whole model collapse idea is not becoming a reality and has already been solved as an obstacle. Sorry

  • You can't lie about being a prostitute during your background investigation and hold a security clearance, no.

  • Political Memes @lemmy.world

    Oh no!

  • memes @lemmy.world

    know the Reddit rules

  • News @lemmy.world

    Nestlé USA Names Martin Thompson as Chief Executive Officer and U.S. Market Head

    www.prnewswire.com /news-releases/nestle-usa-names-martin-thompson-as-chief-executive-officer-and-us-market-head-302324012.html
  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    That was easy

  • KDE @lemmy.kde.social

    Disable Discover launch on start