Skip Navigation

Thoon

@ thoon @feddit.nl

Posts
1
Comments
40
Joined
1 yr. ago

Christian ✝️🐟 | European Federalist 🇪🇺 | Georgist and Social-Libertarian 🔰🗽🌹 |

  • How diverse are your sources of information?

    Jump

  • NOS, Ground News, Deutsche Welle, Fox, CNN,

    Vaush, Asmongold, JBP, Jubilee, Shoe0nHead

    So yeah, pretty diverse

  • How diverse are your sources of information?

    Jump

  • Then you`re likely far left. Are you a libertarian socialist/communist type?

  • Russia allegedly teamed up with a Libyan warlord to trigger a fresh migrant crisis in the European Union

    Jump

  • Exactlg why being Pro-Migration is being Pro-Russian. Youre a pawn, being played by Russia

  • gpt-oss: OpenAI releases 2 open-source models

    Jump

  • Finally, their company name is starting to make SOME sense

  • Chinese students at UK universities told to spy on classmates in attempt to suppress discussion of issues sensitive to the Chinese government, report says

    Jump

  • Calm down and book yourself a therapeutic session.

  • Chinese students at UK universities told to spy on classmates in attempt to suppress discussion of issues sensitive to the Chinese government, report says

    Jump

  • China. The silent killer of the west. Most don't realise the threat the CCP poses to our way of living

  • Removed Deleted

    Fury as 90 criminal charges brought against 41 migrants living in taxpayer-funded hotel

    Jump

  • Lmao. The irony of this entire community. Damn.

    Should only preach to the choir then.

    But lets not shift the goalpost here. Lets talk about this topic

  • Removed Deleted

    Fury as 90 criminal charges brought against 41 migrants living in taxpayer-funded hotel

    Jump

  • So? Isn't the point of media literacy to cover all media even if you think it has an agenda?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Alright. In the fog of war, here is my entire take:

    I must firmly disagree with your justification of vandalism as a legitimate form of activism. My position is grounded in fundamental moral and ethical principles, as well as historical and social analyses, which I will elaborate below.

    At the core of my argument is the Kantian ethical framework, which posits that moral actions must be universally applicable and respect the dignity of all individuals. Vandalism, defined as the willful destruction or defacement of property, inherently violates this principle. It treats the property and rights of others as mere means to an end rather than as ends in themselves, which is a clear contravention of Kant’s Categorical Imperative. This moral law is unconditional and applies to all rational agents, meaning that vandalism cannot be justified by appealing to the supposed nobility of its cause or the privilege of those who criticize it

    Vandalism involves an act of destruction that disrespects the rights of property owners and the broader community. It is an illegal act that undermines social cohesion and trust, which are essential for any functioning society. The fact that vandalism is often motivated by frustration or a desire to draw attention to an issue does not absolve it of its moral wrongness. Instead, it highlights the need for more constructive and respectful forms of activism.

    Read here for more info:

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral https://iep.utm.edu/kantview https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-ethics/chapter/kantian-deontology https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/esg/kantian-ethics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kantian_ethics

    You suggest that criticizing vandalism is a form of "pearl-clutching" or a sign of privilege. I strongly disagree. Ethical criticism of vandalism is not about privilege or moral superiority but about upholding universal moral principles that apply to all people, regardless of their social position. Privilege does not invalidate the ethical critique of harmful actions; rather, it is the responsibility of all individuals, especially those with privilege, to critically examine their own biases and the implications of their actions.

    The coin model of privilege and critical allyship emphasizes that focusing solely on the needs of privileged individuals can marginalize oppressed groups. However, this does not mean that privileged individuals cannot or should not critique harmful behaviors, including vandalism. On the contrary, it is through education, self-reflection, and dialogue that individuals can understand their privilege and work toward justice without resorting to destructive actions

    Read here for more info: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373175555_Understanding_Privilege_and_Engaging_in_Activism_Elevating_Social_Justice_in_Social_Work https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-019-7884-9 https://www.dpag.ox.ac.uk/work-with-us/equality-diversity-inclusion/anti-racism-working-group/anti-racism-resources-march-2023-intersectionality-of-privilege

    A fundamental ethical principle is that the morality of an action cannot be determined solely by its ends. Vandalism, even when committed in the name of a noble cause, involves illegal and destructive means that harm individuals and communities. The psychological and social effects of vandalism include increased fear, insecurity, and erosion of trust within communities. These consequences undermine the very social fabric that activists often seek to strengthen.

    Historical and contemporary evidence shows that extreme protest tactics, including vandalism, often reduce public support for movements and provoke backlash. For instance, the Just Stop Oil movement’s vandalism of artworks and historic sites has been widely criticized and has led to negative public opinion, with surveys showing only 18% support for such actions. This alienation of the public and potential allies weakens the movement’s effectiveness and undermines its goals

    Read here for more info: https://unherd.com/newsroom/just-stop-oils-activism-is-turning-into-blackmail/?lang=us https://impactnottingham.com/2022/10/just-stop-oil-is-vandalism-the-way-to-save-the-planet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Stop_Oil https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/just-stop-oil-extinction-rebellion-climate-protest https://blogs.qub.ac.uk/pb-happ/2024/04/22/are-the-just-stop-oil-protests-disruptive-or-democratic

    The history of social movements, particularly the civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King Jr., demonstrates the power of nonviolent resistance. King’s philosophy of nonviolence was grounded in love, understanding, and a commitment to justice that sought to win the friendship of opponents rather than humiliate them. This approach not only achieved significant policy changes but also garnered widespread public support and moral authority. Which is wat I actually gathered from your source

    Nonviolent resistance is far more effective in effecting social and political change than violent or destructive tactics. It attracts broad support, fosters trust, and builds lasting alliances. Modern activism that prioritizes shock value and media attention over constructive engagement risks alienating potential supporters and diluting the moral integrity of the cause

    Read here for more infor: https://naacp.org/find-resources/history-explained/civil-rights-leaders/martin-luther-king https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/nonviolence https://time.com/5101740/martin-luther-king-peaceful-protests-lessons/ https://www.loc.gov/collections/civil-rights-history-project/articles-and-essays/nonviolent-philosophy-and-self-defense/ https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/02/why-nonviolent-resistance-beats-violent-force-in-effecting-social-political-change https://mshistorynow.mdah.ms.gov/issue/the-civil-rights-movement-in-mississippi-on-violence-and-nonviolence https://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=honors https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/us-civil-rights-movement-1942-1968 https://jcls.org/2022/01/18/mlk-jr-s-nonviolent-but-disruptive-activism https://southern.libguides.com/civilrights/nonviolentprotest https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/nonviolent-resistance-racial-relations

    In closing, I want to reiterate my respect for the causes that vandalism often aims to support—such as climate justice or social equity. These are vital issues that demand attention and action. However, my disapproval of vandalism as a method is unwavering because it is wrong, harmful, and counterproductive. Vandalism undermines the moral fabric of society, alienates potential supporters, and distracts from the substantive goals of activism.

    I urge a reconsideration of the justification of vandalism in favor of more constructive, morally sound, and effective forms of activism that respect human dignity and social cohesion. This is not only a matter of ethical principle but also of strategic efficacy in achieving meaningful change.

    So I truly hope you are happy now given my extensive paragraph defending something that should be common sense. But alas, here it is.

    Enjoy the rest of your day. Because this is plain stupid, and thank God I am not American

  • Teenager jailed for plotting mass shooting at Edinburgh school

    Jump

  • Oh boy are you in for a treat. Dont search Nazi femboys then

  • Teenager jailed for plotting mass shooting at Edinburgh school

    Jump

  • Mentally fucked. What the hell happened?! Lack of therapy, lack of socializing? Lack of a father?

    My god

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Your voices? Your money? Your attention?

    Please consider those before you start going apeshit, thanks.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Your argument suffers from a fundamental failure to distinguish between the critique of activist methods and the opposition to the causes those activists champion. By conflating criticism of vandalism with support for genocide, you commit a straw man fallacy that betrays a lack of nuance and intellectual honesty.

    Your comparison of modern activism to the nonviolent resistance of Martin Luther King Jr. and Jesus is a false equivalence that ignores the moral and strategic distinctions between peaceful protest and destructive behavior. MLK’s activism was grounded in the belief that nonviolence exposes injustice and appeals to conscience, whereas vandalism risks alienating allies and undermining community trust.

    Your justification of any action against genocide, regardless of method, is ethically untenable. It violates Kant’s Categorical Imperative, which demands that actions be guided by universalizable maxims. Condoning destruction as a means to oppose genocide risks moral decay and social fragmentation, as history and ethical theory demonstrate.

    Moreover, your reliance on whataboutism and tu quoque fallacies reveals an attempt to deflect substantive critique by attacking the critic rather than the argument. This rhetorical strategy is intellectually dishonest and undermines the possibility of meaningful dialogue.

    In sum, your position fails to meet the standards of logical consistency, ethical integrity, and strategic effectiveness.

  • World’s ‘oldest baby’ born from embryo frozen in 1994

    Jump

  • Bizarre breakthrough, absolute amazing

  • Epic Games Store is coming to the Play Store as Google loses in court appeal

    Jump

  • Good call. Even digital markets are markets and shouldnt be monopolized

  • If everyone spontaneously became the same race the world would realize that the rich are the real problem

    Jump

  • Of course he was fr*nch

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Let’s cut to the chase. Comparing vandalism to the activism of MLK and Jesus is a false equivalence. Their activism was rooted in peaceful protest, not destruction. You claim vandalism works, so show me the results. How has breaking stuff actually helped the cause?

    And let’s talk about your accusation that I’m supporting genocide. That’s a serious claim. I haven’t said anything close to that. Criticizing methods isn’t the same as opposing the movement. I simply believe, nay, KNOW that smashing windows isn’t the way to win hearts and minds. Just look at Just Stop Oil in the UK. Everybody fucking hates them.

    You call me an 'armchair quarterback', but where’s your playbook? What are your strategies beyond just causing chaos? If we’re talking about effective activism, let’s see some constructive actions. Vandalism might make noise, but does it make change? I doubt it.

    Let’s hear your constructive ideas for change instead of defending destruction. What’s your plan beyond breaking things? Because whining like a child might've worked when you were young. But we're adults now.

    Christ I despise radicals

  • Czech Startup Mewery Gains €3 Million in Funding for Cultivated Meat Development

    Jump

  • Thats why corporatism is so dangerous, especially lobbying. Personally I think lobbying should be banned outright and only through petitions.

    Keep the corpo's out of governments

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Opposing genocide you can rightly do, I share that sentiment.

    And never have I defended the genocide in Gaza.

    Christ.

    Is it really. REALLY that difficult to think: "Oh, genocide is bad. But we also shouldn't use vandalism"

  • BuyFromEU @feddit.org
    Thoon @feddit.nl

    How would we convince people to join Lemmy?