tymon

6

Thanks for such a clear answer! I'm definitely not interested in ever getting involved in Lemmy Drama, so it does seems like LW might not be the way to go. I'll do a little digging; Lemmy.zip seems good, but feel free to throw any other suggestions my way!

2

tymon @lemm.ee 11mo ago

My info is a little outdated, but it seems like the obvious choice would be Lemmy.world - is that a mistake?

8

tymon @lemm.ee 11mo ago

My information is a little outdated; do you know why some people seem to have a strong aversion to migrating to Lemmy.world?

10

tymon @lemm.ee 11mo ago

Man, have I been out of the loop. I'm looking into a few new instances.

What's everyone's feelings on Lemmy.world? I know there's been some huff about them in the past, but I'm interested in stability and ease for the most users.

tymon @lemm.ee 11mo ago

I'm considering a move - will update the community shortly.

3

tymon @lemm.ee 11mo ago

fuck do you mean "legendary"

he's just another shithead capitalist

1

tymon @lemm.ee 11mo ago

You should post this in I Made This

tymon @lemm.ee 1y ago

Almost every day. Whether I'm skipping a step, avoiding a puddle, panic-flailing away from a sudden pile of dog shit, or trying to grab something from a too-high shelf in my small apartment, living in Brooklyn means you're idiot-floating more often than not

tymon @lemm.ee 1y ago

ah! silly me

2

tymon @lemm.ee 1y ago

What is an S3 bucket?

1

tymon @lemm.ee 1y ago

I guess what I mean by Star Wars is they want to be doing what Disney+ is doing; serialized Cinematic Universe that's all boom boom pow pow?

3

tymon @lemm.ee 1y ago

Absolutely. Ideological consistency =/= stagnation; my two favorite pieces of Trek are The Voyage Home and the Dominion War arc, and while they may not share almost anything on the surface, their core thrusts are wholly aligned!

The fundamental lack of understanding of the purpose and point of Trek as an idea that Kurtzman et al have consistently demonstrated clearly illustrates not simply a schism in taste, but one of worldview, politics, and values.

These guys just wanna be making Star Wars - and there ain't anything wrong with that! It's just that Star Wars and Star Trek are for, and accomplish, different things!

1

tymon @lemm.ee 1y ago

Is this in regards to the Skydance acquisition? I thought that had gotten canned!

5

tymon @lemm.ee 1y ago

So much of the mindset expressed by Kurtzman in this interview makes me sick and sad. I typed out these thoughts elsewhere before but I'm repeating them here:

In my opinion the purpose of Star Trek, when functioning properly, is not just to be optimistic, but aspirational; it’s to show us a vision of a future in which we’ve surmounted the problems that face us today.

TNG has so far been the keenest example of this, moreso than TOS or any of the Treks that followed. DS9 may be my favorite Trek, but it’s also responsible for setting a dubious precedent of darkness in the property that subsequent showrunners have been incapable of wielding, or even of understanding.

A major part of this is the nu-Trek focus on “optimism” over “aspiration.” Yeah, it might sound like arguing semantics at first, but I really don’t think it is. Regardless of the dictionary definition of those two words, we use them in specific ways in modern parlance.

I feel like most people understand optimism as a positive attitude, a glass-half-full outlook, or even just a sunny disposition. At best, it’s understood as personal traits adhering to a broadness of vision, generosity, and kindness. Yeah, these are good and virtuous characteristics; but they’re not really the same as something being aspirational.

A future we aspire to is a very different thing than a future containing positive people. There are positive, optimistic people all over the place in today’s world, and yet… just look around. We kind of live in hell!

I guess what I’m saying is that optimism is mostly an emotion, whereas aspiration is a goal.

Star Trek, when functioning as it should, is aspirational because it shows us what humanity and society could be like once we surmount the problems facing us today.

So I guess that this, for me, is the principal failing of Abrams and Kurtzman-era Trek; in this future, humanity still succumbs to the pains and pitfalls of present-day life in a way that suggests we won’t grow out of them. Sure, they contain positive, optimistic, kind, gentle, generous people, but society as a whole has simply iteratively progressed instead of having wholly transformed.

There are so many little specific cumulative examples I can give of this, but I know once I start listing them, I’ll forget to list ten more that are better. Maybe I’ll make that list someday when I have some time to kill; but for now, the biggest offenders are the constant tropes of The Galaxy Facing a Danger Unlike Anything We’ve Ever Seen, and the handling of Section 31 as an organization + subsequent reality of the movie.

Another major problem is that the seasons are all too short, so we rarely ever get any breathing room downtime with the characters! 20+ episode seasons are a vital, crucial, fundamental component of Trek as a property, and it’s really not adapting well at all to the modern format of shows.

5

tymon @lemm.ee 1y ago

TMBG? Teenage Mutant Binja Gurtles?

1

tymon @lemm.ee 1y ago

Oh, hush. My answer was about all of it.