to be fair, that wouldn't be my pick at that pricepoint. That single-core performance would still be unmatched, but I would have something with better IO, more RAM, and more life in it.
Scala @programming.dev Haoyi Li - The Making of the com.lihaoyi Ecosystem | Scala Days 2023 Seattle
World News @lemmy.ml China suspends youth jobless data after record high readings
Scala @programming.dev IntelliJ Scala Plugin 2023.2 Is Out! | The Scala Plugin Blog
Scala @programming.dev Go-like channels in Scala: receive, send, and default clauses
Scala @programming.dev Metals v1.0.0 - Silver | Metals
PostgreSQL @programming.dev Queries prioritization using pgbouncer
Programming @programming.dev Meta developer tools: Working at scale
Scala @programming.dev com.lihaoyi Scala: Executable Pseudocode that's Easy, Boring, and Fast
Scala @programming.dev FeaturedWelcome to this Scala community

Hard disagree, the more you look at it, the more this can be described as "a product to convince people that discuss technology online that this is a product for tons of people". Most people need HDMI more than they need record-matching single-thread performance. Most people need more RAM because almost all they do is web-based and not MacOS native. Most people need I/O because they have mice, weird peripherals, and tons of usb drives, mostly USB-A.
That said, it's a magnificent second or third device for the tech elite that's already committed to the Apple ecosystem (having nothing on-device, whose peripherals and I/O needs are covered by more general-purpose computers) and who will absolutely brag that the performance of this lets them do lots of coding (using it as a metric for what a good computer is, in their eyes). Strangely both things can be true at the same time!