This court has relied on several occasions on a historical tradition test for determining constitutionality. If they apply that here, historical examples of discriminating against trans people will only support keeping discriminatory laws.
It has the bill of rights but not all constitutional amendments. Among other things, in Trumps bible, slavery is still legal and women can't vote, just the way they want it.
That reminds me of the attitude a lot of Democrats had during 2016 primaries about Trump. “He’s such a horrible candidate, Clinton will definitely win against him. Let’s make sure he wins the primary.”
Wildlife veterinarians job is to treat captured animals and release them back into the wild. If you want any specifics you would have one of them.
My initial comment did not explicitly say they would be treated because I thought that would be obvious. I guess I gave you too much credit. But you still should have figured it out when I mention veterinarians.
Who is going to pay for that? The government? Why would voters agree to spend money on something needed about once a decade?
Again that's not something I am qualified to to work out. You would have to ask someone else for that.
I thought you would prefer something more polar bear oriented, but OK. And to be clear since I think your reading comprehension might be failing you again, they treat the diseases before releasing the animals.
Wildlife veterinarians job is to treat captured animals and release them back into the wild. If you want any specifics you would have one of them
In Churchill, Canada they have a polar bear jail, where they place captured polar bears that wander into town. I would guess that some veterinary care is provided since they stay there for up to 30 days, but you'd have to ask them for any specifics if you want it.
Releasing captured diseased animals has been done before. You are welcome to ask those that have done that what considerations were made for preventing the spread of disease, but as I have said repeatedly, I am not an expert in the relevant field, so I won't speculate.
Also, if I’m a troll, you should be flagging me for the moderators.
They removed my sarcastic comment calling it a troll. I have no expectation that they would recognize sea-lioning.
This court has relied on several occasions on a historical tradition test for determining constitutionality. If they apply that here, historical examples of discriminating against trans people will only support keeping discriminatory laws.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_v._Bremerton_School_Districthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen