Where did you learned because this is basically all wrong in lines, every way.
What do you mean there is an embedded brainfuck. Brain fuck is a programing language. That's like saying there's an embedded English. It doesn't make any sense.
Furthermore, the idea that sucks characters can represent the intelligence of Model is not only wrong, but shows that you don't even understand the framework enough to know why. We don't have a great understanding of what makes something "intelligent" to begin with, let alone the ability to distill it into a single character.
This isn't even to get into what you said about it being based on sexual definitions and scope. This isn't remotely true. It's all algorithmic reinforcement learning.
If you don't know things it's ok, but don't speak like you do, you might trick someone, worst of all yourself, into listening
Not really. Sexual attraction is merely something you feel. Objectification is when you let that dominate your view of someone. When you reduce them to nothing but a sexual object. You can feel sexual attraction without it being primary factor in how you see someone.
I mean this with complete sincerity. This is the kind of thing you should talk to a therapist about. You don't need to live your life constantly waiting for people to let you down. You can find people who you can trust. You can be happy. It's worth trying
There's actually no reason to be this much of a dick to this dude. He's just a random guy on the internet who doesn't like cats as much as dogs. The fact you needed to write multiple sarcasm filled paragraphs says more about you than whatever you were trying to convey.
Where did you learned because this is basically all wrong in lines, every way.
What do you mean there is an embedded brainfuck. Brain fuck is a programing language. That's like saying there's an embedded English. It doesn't make any sense.
Furthermore, the idea that sucks characters can represent the intelligence of Model is not only wrong, but shows that you don't even understand the framework enough to know why. We don't have a great understanding of what makes something "intelligent" to begin with, let alone the ability to distill it into a single character.
This isn't even to get into what you said about it being based on sexual definitions and scope. This isn't remotely true. It's all algorithmic reinforcement learning.
If you don't know things it's ok, but don't speak like you do, you might trick someone, worst of all yourself, into listening