Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
18
Comments
1788
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I'd say educational system, or better, it's downfall through decades, plays a significant role in making population dumb enough to not see through these constant lies.

  • Nope, as others mentioned is the content, or better, the lack of it. The lack of monetization could be the main culprit.

  • Feature proposed by China and US, I'd say.

  • Supposedly with consent and knowledge of.

  • She is an amateur. She should just say that she didn't know them and it's certainly a democrats conspiracy.

  • Yep, most likely. Nigerians probably just can't afford to say that they didn't have a part.

  • They just need to Edit/Replace "Trump" to something else.

  • They did, nobody wanted to talk.

  • Hey, great public-private cooperation /s

  • So, there is value in labels after all?

  • LOL, only now? You get two tankers for free, then we'll be concerned for like next 10 of those and then after 20 or so, we'll whine a bit and so on?

  • But that's nothing new. There are ton of reports saying the same, yet MAGA won't listen, why would they listen now?

  • Why do they even bother censoring it at this point? Like this is something MAGA isn't drooling over and have no issues with whatsoever.

  • Imagine the Orange government demanding some delicate data for some political or pretty reason - should provider still comply? What if Chinese government does the same? Also I might be mistaken, but doesn't US force providers not to disclose the request to affected party, at least they can?

  • So, you do get benefits from Spotify, don't you? Besides, there are other streaming services around that supposedly pay better - as you said. Anyway, all good to you, hope you succeed and Spotify dies one day.

  • What is stopping them? But it seems that general consensus here is that artists would like you to listen for free and here and there buy something from them.

  • It is really refreshing how this thread spins in "we know what's best for the artists, certainly not paying for listening to their streams, that's exactly what they want". If you don't want to use Spotify, that's fine, I don't want to either because they are an awful company. But that doesn't make you the person who create the rules for artists nor does it give you the permission to listen to illegal content.

  • right back atcha!

    How so? You are the wiser what artists really wants - not being paid for listening to their music and would like you to listen to it for free. I merely follow what they offer and not trying to listen to it illegally.

  • It might shock you, but content on YouTube gets paid. And illegal sources out there don't make it more legal to share it. It's funny though, you are basically saying what? Listen for free, middle finger to authors, and buy merchandise? As opposite to listen legally, authors get something and buy merchandise? But hey, I'm glad that you speak for authors.